Your mickey is so big that you are afraid of being recognised by it?
Fine, but I think checking his references misses the point. No one denies that he has seen some of the escorts he reviewed. But even he admits that he hasn't seen all of them. So he won't have any trouble getting references. In fact, I'm sure he would have no trouble getting references even if he had seen none of the escorts he reviewed. Think about it. He has 84 reviews. 78 are positive. For many of these escorts his review is their only positive review from a "trusted reviewer". I'm sure there are at least three who would be willing to write a reference for someone they hadn't seen in order to keep those badged reviews.
The jury is not out. It returned a verdict. I don't see Anon as hungry for blood. It's just that it's misleading to call someone a "trusted reviewer" when most people do not, in fact, trust him.
Before someone accuses me of being out for blood, I want to make very clear that "trusted" and "genuine" are two different words which have different meanings. Saying that I don't trust someone's reviews is not the same as saying I think he is a fake.