new review idea

[whiteknight111]

There was some discussion in this thread
https://www.escort-ireland.com/board...r-reviews.html
about this for some reason 4 different mods attacked the idea
in a series of elqoquent attacks? Are they also against El gordos blog and the escort of month competeion
which also use numbers?

THE IDEA
Use maths to create an automatic escort reliabity score for each escorts and tables to display it,

1:each review is fed into equation which assigns it a relaibity score
based on each reviews varibles e.g. no of reviews of reviewer, satstisfaction ratings etc etc etc.
2:These scores are summed for all reviews of the escort
3:This total reliabity score is displayed on the escorts page next to number of reviews.
4:Somewhere in the review section of website the following two lists are created
Active Escorts by number of reviews (already exists currently top 30 including inactive escorts)
Active Escorts by total reliabity score

for example I don't want to name names but there are currently two escorts on site each with 8 reviews
One girl 5 of reviews are first time and two are second time all postive , one negative from a guy with 10 reviews.
The other girl has also 8 postive review two of them trusted reviews between all 8 of her reviewers they have nearly 100 reviews between them. If we fed these numbers into the system girl no 2 would have a far better total reliabity score on her page and her postion in table would be far higher than girl one.

WHY DO IT?
The design of the equation would not be hard theres only a few input variables
and the software to create these scores and tables does not seem like a hard thing to do
By weighting the input variables it should be possible to make life much harder for fake reviewers
Such a set of tables and scores would really highlight the geniune escorts and really show up the fake/crap ones.
Many punters don't have time to check everything out I would imagine to check all reviews and such
so it would save a lot of time.
The tables and scores would be a aid to picking an escort.
To defeat system fake reviewers would have have to work very hard and the more reviews they write the more mistakes they make and more reviews of girls they are in compotetion with they would have to write
Such a system would not give much weight to reviewers with only a few reviews thus making the point
of writing fake reviews pointless.
End result more business to good girls less business to bad girls
more happy punters more unhappy hustlers.

Now all we need is equation and a bit of elbow grease?

[Quarterpoundher]

I don't know why there is a tendency here to say a mod is "attacking" something when they just express an opinion or view within the rules of conduct. Maybe its the mindset of the person using that term or similar words or maybe its just that the tone of how something is said is lost with the written word but I am getting tired of being painted in that light when all I am doing is expressing my opinion in a calm and considered way.

[Noah]

If Patricia wants to pay for me to personally verify the ladies i am prepared to to do that and offer my feed back to the punters here, i know i will have to have sex multiple times daily but i am willing to endure for the sake of a quality review system.

what do you think Patricia?

[luther]

There was some discussion in this thread
https://www.escort-ireland.com/board...r-reviews.html
about this for some reason 4 different mods attacked the idea
in a series of elqoquent attacks?

Where 4 mods "attacked" this idea...........

Otherwise retract the statement................

[whiteknight111]

Where 4 mods "attacked" this idea...........

Otherwise retract the statement................

Luther
"no need for the maths"
Carlos
"you might as well shove a carrot up your arse in an attempt to analyse how it tastes"
Highwayman
"it would not be for me. i rather use biological methods"
QPH
"put down the slide rule and take a deep breath lads"
"attacked" was strong word i should have said question or oppose.
although carlos did incite we should insert carrots in your anus?

We are taking about generating a table which lists escorts on their relabilty
using there reviews data as input.
This table could be used as a guide/aid in picking a reliable escort.
Its simialar to El Gordos blog but automatic, for all escorts and with more data inputted.
Good escort = 1/2M(nhU/M²r) + U/r((nh)³(r/MU)³) - 3/2(√Uh/mR6) + λεπ²

Q.E.D.

[luther]

Luther
"no need for the maths"
Carlos
"you might as well shove a carrot up your arse in an attempt to analyse how it tastes"
Highwayman
"it would not be for me. i rather use biological methods"
QPH
"put down the slide rule and take a deep breath lads"
"attacked" was strong word i should have said question or oppose.
although carlos did incite we should insert carrots in your anus?

I take offence to being accused of attacking an idea with the words "no need for the maths"........

I can't speak for the other mods but I'd like the alligegation withdrawn..........

If people here think a statement like "no need for the maths" is an attack on an idea, a post or a poster them this place has finally gone nuts..........

We are taking about generating a table which lists escorts on their relabilty
using there reviews data as input.
This table could be used as a guide/aid in picking a reliable escort.
Its simialar to El Gordos blog but automatic, for all escorts and with more data inputted.
Good escort = 1/2M(nhU/M²r) + U/r((nh)³(r/MU)³) - 3/2(√Uh/mR6) + λεπ²

Q.E.D.

While I have no problem with your idea or suggestion it could only ever be used as a guide. These are human beings we're talking about, not machines, and there are so many variables to take into account...........

What I meant by my comment was that people should be able to make up their own minds based on the profile they are viewing and the reviews thay read without the need for a mathamitical formula..........

[whiteknight111]

i thought I did withdraw it I said in post
"""attacked" was strong word i should have said question or oppose.""

[carlos marvado]

i thought I did withdraw it I said in post
"""attacked" was strong word i should have said question or oppose.""

Don't worry about it Whiteknight.......we'll convert you from science to literature yet.......a well written factual review paints a prettier picture than 1/2M(nhU/M²r) + U/r((nh)³(r/MU)³) - 3/2(√Uh/mR6) + λεπ².

[carlos marvado]

Luther
"no need for the maths"
Carlos
"you might as well shove a carrot up your arse in an attempt to analyse how it tastes"
Highwayman
"it would not be for me. i rather use biological methods"
QPH
"put down the slide rule and take a deep breath lads"

Pure literary genius. I am indeed both humbled and greatly honoured that my quotation has found it's way amongst the company of such august thespians. No doubt these few words will find a hallowed place within the archives of this great site.....I might even amend my signature to make room for the carrot up the arse.

"attacked" was strong word i should have said question or oppose.
although carlos did incite we should insert carrots in your anus?

Indeed "attack" was a bit strong and "incite" was also the wrong word.........I was inviting the membership to insert a carrot in said orifice to test the theory that one can get a sense of taste from so doing. However, I would recommend the pine fresh butt plug over the carrot. The carrot should be a suppository of last resort when something larger cannot be found. Don't knock it until you've tried it old boy.

Q.E.D.

Here, you can get yourself banned for spouting foreign shite around here.

[Quarterpoundher]

1/2M(nhU/M²r) + U/r((nh)³(r/MU)³) - 3/2(√Uh/mR6) + λεπ²

You had me at 1/2M you sexy beast...