Sexual Offences Act 2017

[jessicabp]

EI deleted from the list, to force the girls to pay double advert.

Excellent advice.

Even if escorts list massage as a favourite that would help. I am not sure why it is not now listed, my memory is that it used to be. My guess is that many escorts don't want to be bothered with massage as a favourite. It would certainly be helpful to us if they would also list massage as a separate service but I doubt if that will gain traction, given that massage providers have separate adverts.

[Moocher]

EI deleted from the list, to force the girls to pay double advert.

Yes, I thought that this would be the case. If the escort mentions in her profile wording that she will provide massage services, will those words be deleted ?

[jessicabp]

Yes, I thought that this would be the case. If the escort mentions in her profile wording that she will provide massage services, will those words be deleted ?

I think so, it was very different before

[MidlifeCrisis]

An excellent letter!

One suggestion - you might want to consider referencing this study, which was carried out at Queen's University Belfast as part of a review of the impact of the legislation in the north of Ireland.

https://www.justice-ni.gov.uk/sites/...ng-for-sex.pdf

As well as giving convincing evidence that the legislation up north has had no discernable benefits, it casts doubt on the evidence from Sweden and elsewhere, pointing out that those jurisdictions do not have high quality before-and-after data.

Whatever happens, I wish you well. Although the legislation clearly opens up the possibility of having to appear in court, the risks appear to be really tiny if you are reasonably careful. Given your previous practice of visiting a small number of regulars, I would encourage you to consider if it is time to take that small risk.

[ladiesman217]

Well written, but you're wasting your time. It won't even reach the TD you are sending it to. It will be picked up by one of their lackeys, and they'll send you a generic reply saying "thank you for emailing Mr/Ms ____. We will forward this on to ____. BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH. Kind regards!"

Never mind wolves in sheep's clothing, they are all SNAKES in sheep's clothing! Useless fucking cunts who poison the very air they inhale! I HOPE YOU ALL DIE VERY LONG AND PAINFUL DEATHS YOU TRAITOROUS FUCKS, EVERY FUCKING ONE OF YOU!

[DamoEI]

Well written, but you're wasting your time. It won't even reach the TD you are sending it to. It will be picked up by one of their lackeys, and they'll send you a generic reply saying "thank you for emailing Mr/Ms ____. We will forward this on to ____. BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH. Kind regards!"

Never mind wolves in sheep's clothing, they are all SNAKES in sheep's clothing! Useless fucking cunts who poison the very air they inhale! I HOPE YOU ALL DIE VERY LONG AND PAINFUL DEATHS YOU TRAITOROUS FUCKS, EVERY FUCKING ONE OF YOU!

Stop beating around the bush and tell us how you REALLY feel!

[ladiesman217]

Stop beating around the bush and tell us how you REALLY feel!

If they want to see what real hate speech is, I'll show them real f*cking hate speech.

Let's just say it involves a knife, and a whole new meaning to 'blowjob' -> Varadkar, Martin, McEntee, Donnelly, you'd be the initial f*cking receivers of that hate speech!!

[Larrii]

If they want to see what real hate speech is, I'll show them real f*cking hate speech.

Let's just say it involves a knife, and a whole new meaning to 'blowjob' -> Varadkar, Martin, McEntee, Donnelly, you'd be the initial f*cking receivers of that hate speech!!

Yeh, yeh, but how BAAAD does it make you FEEEL?

[The Libertarian]

2 Things -

1 Re: disabled people engaging with sex workers, ordinarily men who are not disabled doing this are taken by TORLERS as using and abusing women. When it happens to be disabled clients it's taken by these fcuking loons as sex workers taking advantage of vulnerable folk!

2 Varadkar before his political mentor Fitzie Fitzie brought in the anti sex worker law IIRC said in Hot Press that he was against the criminalization of clients!

I guarantee that any review will just lead to more oppressive legislation!