Review idea suggestions

[whiteknight111]

I dont see anything fraudulent about this review. Explain yourself.

I am not picking on scarlet or peeler here, there are thousands of dodgy reviews I could have picked
The reason this review is dodgy is he/she is a first time reviewer, registered that day, gave a ambsolutly glowing review, has never posted etc etc, it smells, the moderator left a comment at end

Reviews like this should either be ratted or else flagged some other way e.g. Question mark symbol

Rat symbol = Known Fraud or highly suspected fraud
Question Mark symbol = Suspected fraud or diodgy looking

Lets watch peeler over next couple of months and see if he/she is real

[JAMESCORK]

I am not picking on scarlet or peeler here, there are thousands of dodgy reviews I could have picked
The reason this review is dodgy is he/she is a first time reviewer, registered that day, gave a ambsolutly glowing review, has never posted etc etc, it smells, the moderator left a comment at end

Reviews like this should either be ratted or else flagged some other way e.g. Question mark symbol

Rat symbol = Known Fraud or highly suspected fraud
Question Mark symbol = Suspected fraud or diodgy looking

Lets watch peeler over next couple of months and see if he/she is real

Still can’t see why you find this review "Dodgy". You may notice from my reviews that I had a similar experience with Scarlet, and knowing the girl well I can believe his review. Are you suggesting that SCARLET requires to collude with a punter in order to get a good review, Huh, SCARLET, I think not. What are you suggesting that all first time reviewers should tone it down a bit? Remember a first time reviewer may be a novice to the game and can get a little bit excited after his encounter. I was there once and I’m sure you were. As you have mentioned the Mods response - I never really understand the requirement for this *** first review*** thing. Isn’t it blatantly obvious that this is his first review? It is also blatantly obvious when he joined?, its stated there on the page.

Whitenight - Having examined your new proposals for the review system I think that they are unnecessary. Color coded messages are not what’s needed. In my opinion I feel the Trusted Reviewer system actually does work. But we have to be able to trust the “trusted reviewers”. If I was staff I would list each current trustee, and examine his profile and history within some kind of forum and guarantee his trustee status. Once the general punter public can be more assured that these are trusted reviewers now we have a working system. A potential trustee should have at least 10 reviews. Posts to the Community Site should not be as important. There are a lot of goods reviewers out there that I would trust, that do not have a badge. It’s not too hard to work out who is legit and who is a waster. I think the current results in your poll reflect that this is what’s needed Patricia.

[zicooo]

badges for "trusted reviewers" what does that mean, they have more reviews than anyone else of women who cant read or speak english so cant complain. some reviews are barely in english, others are macho nonsense, im so bis, she moaned, i came 50 times. seriously the review concept is helpful, escorts who do not participate hurt themselves, very often they are a moving feast, substitutes added by agencies, my own particular gripe is a review of mme avenante who i have on ly ever mer once, only an illiterate would regard that as a n/a, let me be clear i had a wonderful time with her, it matters to her not to me, so that should be changed, so sort it out, she deserves that, you have award winners, for what exactly? this is an information forum not a back slapping one.

[luther]

my own particular gripe is a review of mme avenante who i have on ly ever mer once, only an illiterate would regard that as a n/a, let me be clear i had a wonderful time with her, it matters to her not to me, so that should be changed, so sort it out, she deserves that, you have award winners, for what exactly? this is an information forum not a back slapping one.

Hmmm.............

The reason the review you left for Mademoiselle Avenante is marked n/a is because under the options for "Booking Outcome" you selected the option "Met with escort, but left without receiving service" so I suppose that would make you the illiterate............

No awards for you today...............

Sort it out eh Zicooo.....................

[mariusdarius]

this is my first time postin. My opinion is that the review system at the moment is really f*** up. You get the rat way to fast or sometimes when some ppl should they don't. I have 2 reviews of the same girl and the 2nd review has a rat next to it why it doesn't say. I am a real punter so what is the explication for it. Or i did notice 1 really strange thing with 1 escort reviews. For a long time she only had a few and in the last 2months she started gettin atleast 1 review dayly if not 2 and 3. Now what are the chances in a bad economy that she has so many review writtgn punters dayly... Come on!

[El Gordo]

Being able to distinguish very (dis)satisfied from somewhat (dis)satisfied at a glance would be good. Even having two different shades of green or of red would probably be enough.

I like the idea of different symbols for definitely fake and possibly fake reviews. Sometimes reviews which are definitely fake are simply deleted, but I prefer to see that an escort has fake reviews, so I know to be cautious with her other reviews. Of course, like many ideas, this one will only work if applied consistently.

I don't like the idea of deciding on reviewer status by number of posts and reviews. If someone posts often enough that I think I have some understanding of his personality then I take his reviews more or less seriously as a result, but I don't care if someone has 100 "drop one keep one" posts.

Counting reviews is possibly even worse. There are two types of fake reviews in the system. Some escorts write their own reviews. The corresponding "reviewers" tend to have one, or occasionally two, reviews. These are never going to get "trusted reviewer" status, no matter how it's given. Then there are professional reviewers, people who go around to escorts asking for money or discounts in exchange for reviews. The really sleazy ones ask for money or discounts in exchange for not writing bad reviews. These reviewers tend to have many reviews, so any system which just counts reviews is very convenient for them.