Quote Originally Posted by MrFussy View Post
Let's recap...we already have a rule about reviews greater than 3 months old...so if a person puts in a date of today but states in review....I saw this girl on her last visit <insert 3, 4, 5, 6....months> or <can't remember the date but was last visit>...as far as I am concerned it should be rejected based on the rule that already exists, this is not happening.
You cannot get rid of the human element, all I am saying is that the system should be revampted (as was agreed), rules enforced, and anyone involved in doing the reviews should be independant i.e. cannot have someone who punts and arbitrates......
we may not be able to get rid of the human element but can improve rules to punish offenders. This could be done in the case of using fake photos or say but in the case of a fake review its not so simple. there are two sides to every story. If an escort is punished for a fake review and its genuine we have a shitstorm.Likewise if a reviewer is punished for a fake review which is genuine we have a shitstorm there.This is what ppl dont realise. All that ppl have to go by is the text and an ip and whether the reviewer is known on the boards as being genuine or an escort is known as being genuine but when you look at it,its not an awful lot along the lines of accuracy.But i get what your saying about dates and specifics.

I dont agree with what your saying about a reviews mod having to be independent at all. In fact i think its easier for someone who is independent to bend the rules and get away with it.

Westside.