"The List" Part 2

[Patricia]

On reflection and with your feedback I have deleted it. Also, a number of people have seen it now, so can tell other users it is just screenshots of IIE, that's all, nothing anyone needs to see really.

[Patricia]

BTW I read all the screenshots and although I don't think most of the clients talked of should have been put on a bad clients list as their "crime" wasn't really a crime, I do think redclover is just out to cause trouble here and me wonder why that is???

[carlos marvado]

Looks to me like that was IIE's bad client reporting system, in which case, it would be up to the administrator's of IIE to ensure that their system is not being abused by escorts to report anything other than those "clients" who could be considered without doubt, to be dangerous. Time wasters are not per say dangerous or bad "clients", they are "time wasters", and in some cases, there may be genuine reasons for their behaviour, i.e.look and go if pics turn out not to be genuine or having to cancel at short notice. Most of the cases on that screen print did however seem to be genuine problem cases, assuming of course that the screen prints were genuine.

The one thing that would be of interest, would be whether the telephone numbers (which were blanked out prior to posting) are full or partial numbers.

[Wildthang]

List list list list and list....... ye know wht

Fuck the list

[Westsidex]

the timewaster list is very handy logic

wouldnt you be wasting more time going through a long list checking if the latest call is on it?

i lowered my cholesterol but incresed my blood pressure,
Westside.

[Brunette Tess]

Apparently my command of the English language is inferior to some of you because I used the term 'smelly bastard'.
Lol, in answer to the question, if you are both fully undressed then it is quite difficult to ask somebody to put their clothes back on and leave.
Going back to the list business, I have not heard anything about this and am quite sure that if it does exist, then perhaps it's only between one or two escorts?
There is no point in going into a huge panic....... especially as it's only bad clients that this lady was putting on her list. If you're a 'goody', then you should have nothing to worry about....

[rover]

[QUOTE=yasmina;144810]

i have never refused a client cause he did a no show and have always give them the benefit of doubt as shit happens but do you know when i have done this how many no shows have actually turned up in 3 years 0.

Any man would want to be out of his head, not to show up for you baby.

[Patricia]

We don't put timewasters, no shows, smellies etc on our list. We only let ladies add the details of dangerous and criminal clients. We also don't show the full number. I would say our list is run responsibly.

What other websites or individual ladies do is another matter.

I would say it is wise for clients to get a punting phone, as unfortunately there are always going to be escorts and websites that don't handle your private info with due care.

The sad thing about all this is that escort safety is the real issue here and it seems bad apples are putting escorts at risk.

It's bad guys that put escorts at risk in the first place.

It's bad escorts that leak lists (No list can be secure. By nature of the fact you give many escorts access to a list, you continually run the risk that any escort could leak any info from it at any time. This is why, if you are running a list, I think you have to make sure there is no info on it that threatens the privacy of clients that are not a threat to escorts.).

And the end result of all these list discussions is that it damages escort security. Many escorts don't use lists because they are scared of bad escorts leaking info and they don't want the hassle of a bad client realising they have reported him or regular clients turning against them because of the bad press ladies often get when it becomes known they use a list.

That's what I find really sad about all this. Women will be hurt because of all this irresponsible behaviour.

[Stewie]

Why would the Star be bothered printing a list of phone numbers of supposed punters that might visit escorts? Anyway, I don't think, legally, they would be allowed print mobile phone numbers without the consent of the owner of the number.

Don't be a pleb I didn't say the star was going to publish it I said using a different sim that is not registered to you then it doesn't matter if you are on a list or if it is published.

Fucking wasting your time considering the legalities of a newspaper publishing a list this is the fucking Internet if the op wanted to post whatever he has there are a million places he could post it and people could search it.

[Forrest]

Don't be a pleb I didn't say the star was going to publish it I said using a different sim that is not registered to you then it doesn't matter if you are on a list or if it is published.

Fucking wasting your time considering the legalities of a newspaper publishing a list this is the fucking Internet if the op wanted to post whatever he has there are a million places he could post it and people could search it.

I didn't say that you said the star would publish it. I said why would the star, or any other newspaper for that matter, be bothered publishing a bunch of random phone numbers, unless they thought some of those numbers belonged to people in the public eye.

I couldn't care less if the list was published in every newspaper in the country as my number won't be on it and it would mean fuck all to most people anyway.