Most reviewers are fake. Most reviews are not.

[El Gordo]

dogwithabone I totally agree with your methods here I think it is reasonable or unless like suggested before if you would like to re review a lady then it should replace the older review this makes great sense to me xxxx

But is it fair to do this retroactively? On two occasions I've written a long review for an escort and then, after another meeting, written another short one with just one or two details I forgot to mention the previous time. I would be unhappy if the long review vanished and only the short one survived.

[Alyssa Jenkins]

But is it fair to do this retroactively? On two occasions I've written a long review for an escort and then, after another meeting, written another short one with just one or two details I forgot to mention the previous time. I would be unhappy if the long review vanished and only the short one survived.

I see what you mean about the long one staying there the point is though unless the escort has actually changed or offered a service different to before one review should really be ok I think. In terms of what you are talking about where there may be multiple reviews for a lady there may be an element of not totally truth within the review once you write it again as the first time you meet this lady its new to you and new to her and from there another person can actually make a fair decision on her reviews however after multiple visits ofcourse you have already formed a relationship or friendship and the review may be based more on that then the actual experience...Even if some like to write more than one review maybe two is good then....On some sites reviewers ar only ever allowed one review for a lady even if he meets her again and again because its based on evidence of a firsttime visit rather than where there is already something personal between you...I know this maybe doesnt sound quite right the way I am writting it but you yourself work with statistics and have been doing this with the review system now add to this the statistic that these two people now have a relationship when the review is being written and take into account the clickfactor and all of that so a first time client reading these reviews is basing alot on what he reads really now your first review would show how it was before you knew each other however your next two would be more personal providing you two enjoyed each others company still...In fairness I think the review system is not that bad on here as when you want to check if someone is real it is quite easy to click on the reviewer and check how many others he has reviewed and like you have pointed out statistically it is really hard work to create a truly fake system where you would have to as an escort have multiple personas writting fake reviews for multiple escorts....I think in fairness the amount of new firsttime reviewers is not that significant either as sometimes escorts may attract this type of person. I wouldnt have many of those reviews a I use a refferal system so it would not be easy for a first time caller to meet me to begin with however other ladies that dont use this system would meet on average more new people...I think that there should be a number of new reviews present but ofcourse also a number of reviews present that show that the reviewer has reviewed other ladies. If I looked for a refferal from a lady and I clicked on her and she had 30 reviews all by firsttime reviewers I wouldnt deem her refferal sufficient for myself however if I clicked on a lady and she had a margin of 50/50 and had some reviews from reputable reviewers I would then trust her..I use the same method you guys use to meet ladies to decide who I myself can trust for a refferal.