just trying to gauge peoples opinions.
nbt
just trying to gauge peoples opinions.
nbt
like westy says, i think you need the 3 reviews to judge the lady properly, as you could get a different service at each visit, but if you go and see the lady more than 3 times then the review that has been there the longest drops ov the ladys display page, but she gets to keep it for her most reviewed poll.
If it was restricted to 1 then if someone wanted to submit another one they could but the older one would be deleted..........
Is this the case???
"It's far easier to fight for principles than to live up to them."
L
i would say 3 reviews but on more then 3 i have seen lynne 3 time and ill hope to see her agan
Never confuse education with intelligence One helps you make a living; the other helps you make a life.
I think that a punter shoud be allowed to write at least 2 or 3 reviews for one escort.
It s simple - an escort can get a very good review but on the other hand she might didnt amaze the client that much to make him return. So it says more about the escort quality, if you see that she is not only reasonably good but she is above average good and makes people return.
And it is even better if the previous review stays on so you can compare, if she is still up to her standards.
There are clients who have seen me 10, 20 or 30 times and more, so why should they have the same chance of writing only 1 review like those who met me just once? these returnig clients do obviously know me better and have experienced me on my good and also bad days. so they should get more chances to make a point in a review.
Example: Lets say that xyz reviews each escort just once. people would think he sees each lady just once. Now imagine he writes a second review for one escort - people will think, that it must be a very special escort, if he made an exception for her. And that is the point. If this happens, why should xyz be forced to keep it for himself? he should be allowed to say his second time opinion ab out this lady.
I'm sorry, my English deceived me a bit more this time but i hope I made my point.