REVIEWS are a REFLECTION of the reviewer

[British Hot Kristie]

Hope you are all having a lovely Christmas day.

Being Christmas day, I'm home, stuffed and a tad bored so decided to have a read through the reviews. I honestly think that some reviewers have anger issues which are projected onto the lady. So much so that they are consciously aware that they will destroy someone's self confidence and not to mention credibility and income and still do it with a passion. There are subtle ways of saying you are not happy with certain things.

Reviews are a reflection of the reviewer - On the contrary to what many reviews believe, it is not just one sided. If when screening I happen to read an EI members reviews and see a big percentage of yellow star ratings, I will refuse an appointment. Why? Because the reviews shows the character of the reviewer and some guys for whatever reason are simply hard to please, no matter how much anyone tries.

[j81]

Hope you are all having a lovely Christmas day.

Being Christmas day, I'm home, stuffed and a tad bored so decided to have a read through the reviews. I honestly think that some reviewers have anger issues which are projected onto the lady. So much so that they are consciously aware that they will destroy someone's self confidence and not to mention credibility and income and still do it with a passion. There are subtle ways of saying you are not happy with certain things.

Reviews are a reflection of the reviewer - On the contrary to what many reviews believe, it is not just one sided. If when screening I happen to read an EI members reviews and see a big percentage of yellow star ratings, I will refuse an appointment. Why? Because the reviews shows the character of the reviewer and some guys for whatever reason are simply hard to please, no matter how much anyone tries.

I must be a happy fucker then K xx

[oldfool]

A well presented view and one I would agree with in general. A lot of negatives are because the punter did not read what was and what was missing from favourities. Therefore poor research. The second problem is the lack of hygiene.
But very often you can see a pattern in a reviewer and their unrealistic expectations.

I wrote a review too soon after a meet which on balance was harsh. I got it removed but decided that if I feel I should write a negative that I now give myself a cooling off period before posting

[Kenton]

Might aswell say all negative reviews are bollox so. Par for the course on here that the client must be in the wrong if the review is negative. Just because they're angry doesn't mean they're clearly the reason for a bad appointment.

[MidlifeCrisis]

Might aswell say all negative reviews are bollox so. Par for the course on here that the client must be in the wrong if the review is negative. Just because they're angry doesn't mean they're clearly the reason for a bad appointment.

Again, read what Kristie said.

[TheKinkyMasseuse]

Might aswell say all negative reviews are bollox so. Par for the course on here that the client must be in the wrong if the review is negative. Just because they're angry doesn't mean they're clearly the reason for a bad appointment.

She is talking about a pattern of behaviour not just a couple of negative reviews. Do you really think we would purposely lose income just to take sides? That would be more than a little silly. TBH I am a little shocked that this would come as news to you. Of course, we are going to check a guys reviews, we are not stupid and know whilst they are trying to get a booking they are on their best behaviour. This all comes under our screening including how you guys act on the boards which I am sure you do a similar thing when selecting an escort.

[oldfool]

Might aswell say all negative reviews are bollox so. Par for the course on here that the client must be in the wrong if the review is negative. Just because they're angry doesn't mean they're clearly the reason for a bad appointment.

That is not what is being said. I have given a lot more positives than negatives, but will give negatives if warranted. In fact I am suspicious of someone who only has given positive. That’s not the real world. However where the lady is experienced then I ask myself who is the more likely guilty person if the meet is not a good one.

[JAMESCORK]

That is not what is being said. I have given a lot more positives than negatives, but will give negatives if warranted. In fact I am suspicious of someone who only has given positive. That’s not the real world. However where the lady is experienced then I ask myself who is the more likely guilty person if the meet is not a good one.

I agree. I hate when a prolific reviewer has nothing but 5 star reviews. I tend to disregard these reviewers. Reviews should be written for the punter NOT the escort. Most forget this.

[Forceuser]

While i do agree that a client should retain the chance to write an honest review of a bad experience and not be condemned
for it,i do get the sense that the odd account gets a real hard on when they get the chance of writing a bad review and have
some serious chips on shoulders regarding escorts

[IrishChloe]

Imagine if we could write reviews on clients, how hilarious would it be reading through them lmao it could prob get turned into a best selling book..