Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345
Results 41 to 47 of 47

Thread: MICHELLE,S new pictures

  1. Default

    Well, what a surprise.
    At first as i told you, there was no timewasting. Understand now you try to make things looks like you are victim, but its all about how people treat each other. From first impression have to say i dont like way how you spoke with me, anyway i was trying to stay friendly but you starts with blackmailing with review etc? I think one thing is clear, its escorts choice with who she want or dont want to meet. Just think about it.

  2. Default

    Bookings with “one day before “notice i do because i am already from 80% booked out, and not because i want to choose who i will or wouldnt meet. If i canceled some appointments thats ONLY because i dont like bad behaviour. I dont accept arogannce, pressure like i will make it that or this way or somebody will give me review. No. I am not used to this, and i already missed my lovely Dundalk, because if i had some bad experience in past, it was only there in Dublin or in Galway. Btw.: sorry that i offended your male ego.
    Michelle x

  3. #43

    Default

    Isn't it amazing how some posts get deleted because it shows the escort in a bad light.

    The user then gets banned because they post about a bad experience.

    Shouldn't this site be impartial? If a positive review/comment is allowed then shouldn't a negative one also be allowed? Especially if its true?

    The banned poster stated they had evidence of the texts between him and Michelle. If you felt the comments were untrue then you could have requested that they were sent to you.

    It would have proved it one way or the other.

    Its not the first time that the site seems to be biased towards an escort.

    I suppose when your paying for advertising you get special treatment.

  4. #44
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    15,941

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Karlihno1234 View Post
    Isn't it amazing how some posts get deleted because it shows the escort in a bad light.

    The user then gets banned because they post about a bad experience.

    Shouldn't this site be impartial? If a positive review/comment is allowed then shouldn't a negative one also be allowed? Especially if its true?

    The banned poster stated they had evidence of the texts between him and Michelle. If you felt the comments were untrue then you could have requested that they were sent to you.

    It would have proved it one way or the other.

    Its not the first time that the site seems to be biased towards an escort.

    I suppose when your paying for advertising you get special treatment.
    The review which was left was malicious and he had even stated he threatened the escort with a negative review.
    We don't accept this at all.

    The person was also banned due some posts that was submitted, abusing the escort.
    If you think that this is fine, then it is not.

    The punter was contacted and continued to harass the escort.
    So due to this, he was banned.

    We will not accept any form of abuse to happen on our site.
    Even after friendly advice was given, the punter ignored this and then continued with his posts, why he was banned.

    As for this thread, I have now closed it.
    Last edited by Floki; 24-10-19 at 12:48.

  5. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Floki For This Useful Post:

    Danny1983 (24-10-19), GOSHH (24-10-19)

Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •