Is an attractive man attractive - without some element of being forceful?

[DroppinLoadsOnYourFaceSon]

You see - I enjoy to think about shit - figure shit out.

The conundrum of sexual gratification has long since been an area of interest.

You see - women can reliably (in the vast majority of cases, anyways), induce an orgasm in men.

However - the same is not necessarily the case in reverse.
In fact - I've heard some women say that, they truly believe orgasm without clitoral stimulation - is effectively a myth.

My contention is this.

Sexual gratification is consistent with high emotional levels.
Most men - when their woman gets highly emotional - they want to run for the fucking hills.
Can't handle that shit.
Most dudes; I may be inferring to a certain degree.

When emotions become high - well, it's consistent with fighting - can be; enmity - that type of feeling.
Yet - that is a precursor - required for sexual gratification.


Consider that high emotion like, electricity.

Say you want to, "light that woman up" - unquestionably force must be applied to consolidate a bond; to overcome resistance?

Does that not make sense?


Now - don't misinterpret me - and make this contentious.
I said force, not excessive force.

Forceful by disposition - not some random act of brute force - like surprise force.
Forceful by character and nature - is what I'm saying.

Agree/disagree?

I'm easy either way; just curious as to opinions.

[DroppinLoadsOnYourFaceSon]

Cliff notes:

Women resist men who cause their emotions to run high - intuitively.

Therefore - man must be forceful in terms of establishing unity, in addition to having the ability to make their emotions run high - to administer pleasure via vaginal penetration.

Agree/disagree?

[DroppinLoadsOnYourFaceSon]

Just sounds rapey to me tbh. Dressed up in pseudo-intellectual language and masking a pitiful desire to be noticed.

The mention of rape is forbidden here.

I never mentioned it, never alluded to it, never even insinuated it.
In fact - I distinctly clarified, force relative to character - not relative to some impulse.

I say force - but that doesn't mean said female must accept that force; they may still reject it.
But the point stands - ultimately, the application of force, going on the basic logic I've outlayed - is pretty much a requisite - provided it's a means to effectively, "light them up" - with high emotion.

[babygravy]

Just sounds rapey to me tbh. Dressed up in pseudo-intellectual language and masking a pitiful desire to be noticed.

I'm with Freyr on this.

If it's not rapey, you need to clarify what you are talking about, because that's what it sounds like.

[Forceuser]

Sexual gratification is consistent with high emotional levels.

ridiculous
even more ridiculous when u consider that its written on an escort forum
by a person that visits escorts

[DroppinLoadsOnYourFaceSon]

ridiculous
even more ridiculous when u consider that its written on an escort forum
by a person that visits escorts

Firstly - mate - I don't, "visit escorts".

I "f**k b****es".

Mmmkay?

Secondly - good sex being predicated on heightened emotions - you're dismissing this idea as being absurd....?

Correct?

Just making sure that I've nailed the pertinent effects.

[Forceuser]

It's not a rapey thread. He makes it clear no physical force is involved.

Fellas try to make girls like them or notice them by force. But force comes in many forms. Chatting up a girl in a club when she tells you she is not interested but you persist anyway, that's force in your behavior, but it's not rape. The fact you didn't walk away at the very second she told you to, but you stayed trying to talk her, that's a form of force. I don't think that's a rapey post.

I do think his posts have too much effort in them to be different, I think he could simplify his language.
Been honest I normally just read the first and last two lines of his posts see can I get the gist of them.
It's not rapey though.

Not what i was talking about,but i do agree with Freyr
at best it comes across as creepy and devious,

his whole point hangs upon the theory that sexual gratification is correlative to emotion levels
which when put on a background of an escort/client dynamic looks ridiculous

[Forceuser]

Firstly - mate - I don't, "visit escorts".

I "f**k b****es".

Mmmkay?

Wow,you're so edgy and cool!!

[DroppinLoadsOnYourFaceSon]

Not what i was talking about,but i do agree with Freyr
at best it comes across as creepy and devious,

his whole point hangs upon the theory that sexual gratification is correlative to emotion levels
which when put on a background of an escort/client dynamic looks ridiculous

Explain why you feel that to be the case; in terms of why it looks ridiculous?

[Forceuser]

Explain why you feel that to be the case; in terms of why it looks ridiculous?

Ok,i'll spell it out for u
sexual gratification is achieved by clients perfectly well (or they wouldnt go back)
with no emotion involved