I was thinking the same. The similarities between the two situations are uncanny.
* Arguably she did nothing wrong -> Genuine clients visiting genuine escorts are arguably doing nothing wrong.
* She's being pursued on the issue by a crowd that don't actually care about Maurice Mc Cabe even though they pretend they do -> the legislation was being pushed through by a crowd that actually don't really care about escorts despite professing to do so.
* She was fucked because politically she was seen as not pursuing the correct course of action -> the legislation got through because, politically, no one could be seen to vote against an anti-trafficking measure.
* She was asking that people look at the evidence -> when she had the chance to listen to the views of genuine escorts she ignored it for her own pre-conceived ideas.
* If most people sat down and examined the issue calming and without a pre-conceived position and took all the facts into account then she'd probably still be in her job -> If they'd done the same with the criminalisation of punters legislation then that would never have passed either.
What goes around, comes around and Fitzgerald got hers. Karma, eh?