View Poll Results: Should escorts users of this site iferring / looking for unprotected sex be banned.

Voters
23. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yep

    12 52.17%
  • Nope

    11 47.83%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 25

Thread: Unprotected Sex Ban from E-I

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    435

    Thumbs down Unprotected Sex Ban from E-I

    I figured i stick up a poll on this.It seems some ppl are just plain down thick.Not only plain down thick but irresponsable as well.

    Anyway,in view on the dnager of unprotected sex my own opinion is any escort caught offering it should be banned from this site.Any threads put up looking for it shopuld be deleted straight away and any clinets looking for it here should be banned from the site as well.This is only my opinion and i dont punt.

    I think its the height of irresponsablity and everything possible should be done by the "The Sweetie" (reg tm) and "The United Colours of Beneton".

    So to delete and ban.That is the question.

    should be obvious enough,
    Westside.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    104
    Reviews
    8

    Thumbs up

    I agree with with you on the unprotected sex part, but to be honest i prefer to have uncovered oral.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    11,822
    Reviews
    35

    Default

    I agree too anyone advertising unprotected sex should be banned and the threads deleted.
    Help Keyla in her fight with cancer. Every little helps.
    It could happen to any of us.
    https://gofund.me/8e340537

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    2,314
    Reviews
    7

    Default

    Its a pity that this is not a public poll. So we can all see whitch two assholes are in favour of spreading disease and risking thier health and that of thier families.
    Maybe they have never seen the results of syphilis..


    Or Clamidia..


    primary syphilis...
    Last edited by Epsilon; 15-04-09 at 10:09.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    435

    Default I just thought the same thing,

    Quote Originally Posted by Epsilon View Post
    Its a pity that this is not a public poll. So we can all see whitch two assholes are in favour of spreading disease and risking thier health and that of thier families.
    Maybe they have never seen the results of syphilis..


    primary syphilis...
    should have made it public,
    Westside.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    16,753
    Reviews
    57

    Default

    I'd love to know who voted NO, anychance they could post the ladies names they have visited so i know who not to call upon??

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,891
    Reviews
    9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anon163 View Post
    I'd love to know who voted NO, anychance they could post the ladies names they have visited so i know who not to call upon??
    That's exactly why it should not be banned.

    If it was allowed you would know who was offering it and who was doing it and then could take measures to ensure you avoid the girls and the other girls these guys are visiting. It would also allow girls to see who was doing what and whether they were taking an increased risk by seeing those guys.

    Banning it just keeps us all in the dark.

    Allowing it is not the same as condoning it.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    3,982

    Default


  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,139
    Reviews
    22

    Default News flash!!

    Just to let you know I myself voted no to banning anyone in relation to unprotected sex.

    1: "oral sex" hence its name is sex, therefor any one offering owo or requesting it would be banned.

    2: We are all adults and are wise enough to make our own choices in life... I dnt need any sort of "big brother" controlling wht i see, read or participate in.

    And last of all just so we are clear on this.... I am in no way condoning unprotected sex in any shape or form. I am 100% against the act unprotected penatrive sex as it shows a lack of respect for all invloved. But banning the subject or anyone who talks or partakes in it is just plain wrong.


    Isnt sex just great!!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    2,314
    Reviews
    7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wildthang View Post
    Just to let you know I myself voted no to banning anyone in relation to unprotected sex.

    1: "oral sex" hence its name is sex, therefor any one offering owo or requesting it would be banned.

    2: We are all adults and are wise enough to make our own choices in life... I dnt need any sort of "big brother" controlling wht i see, read or participate in.

    And last of all just so we are clear on this.... I am in no way condoning unprotected sex in any shape or form. I am 100% against the act unprotected penatrive sex as it shows a lack of respect for all invloved. But banning the subject or anyone who talks or partakes in it is just plain wrong.


    Isnt sex just great!!
    I would have thought that it was pretty obvious that this thread was about unprotected penatrative sex, and not oral, in that case 95% of the escorts that advertise here would be banned.
    Maybe Westside should have spelled it out...

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •