Unprotected Sex Ban from E-I

[rover]

Just thought you might like to know some interesting facts:


Oral to Penis Contact:
Documented Risk - Although the risk is many times smaller than anal or vaginal sex, HIV has been transmitted to receptive partners through oral sex ("blow jobs"), even in cases when insertive partners didn't ejaculate (cum).

Oral to Vagina Contact:
Documented Risk - The risk of HIV transmission during oral sex is low compared to vaginal and anal sex. However, there have been cases of HIV transmission and STDs resulting from oral-vaginal sex.

Oral sex carries a risk for both HIV infection and other sexually transmitted diseases.

people believe oral sex is the safe alternative to intercourse, both from pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases. The statistics prove otherwise. Millions of peoples become infected with STD's such as chlamydia, gonorrhea, HIV and herpes each year and oral sex is a route by which people are becoming infected.

It was a pointless thread anyway, with the exception of the above information, I always wondered about that, as I love oral. I say it was a pointless thread because:
(a) Wev'e had it before.
(b) We all know what the outcomes going to be, the nopes apart from wildthang, were just trying to get up everybodies back I'd imagine.

[Wildthang]

b

Fair enough but what are the chances of that happing, about the same if the condom you are wearing rips or tears during sex. so with your knowledge of std transmission you wont be asking for owo anymore

This is not about what I myself do or don’t do. It is infact a topic about the banning of anyone who offers or looks for unprotected sex cause of the risks involved in that activity.

I am simply saying that the topic shouldn’t be just banned out right. Did you somehow miss that point???

With every discussion people become better informed, isn’t it better to share information of the different risks involved? which in turn helps people make a more informed choice in the activities they partake in.

There are a lot of people who believe that oral sex carries no risks.

By discussing topics like this the risks are highlighted.

Banning a topic is not a educated solution to a risk

[Tommy Singh]

Just to let you know I myself voted no to banning anyone in relation to unprotected sex.

1: "oral sex" hence its name is sex, therefor any one offering owo or requesting it would be banned.

2: We are all adults and are wise enough to make our own choices in life... I dnt need any sort of "big brother" controlling wht i see, read or participate in.

And last of all just so we are clear on this.... I am in no way condoning unprotected sex in any shape or form. I am 100% against the act unprotected penatrive sex as it shows a lack of respect for all invloved. But banning the subject or anyone who talks or partakes in it is just plain wrong.


Isnt sex just great!!

i said ban the people involved.The punters who look for it and the escorts that provide it.Why?

Because like you said we are all adults and if i were a punters gf or wife ,i would like to think that i would at least have some say in my possible death through an STD.

So to clarify ,ban the subject nope.Ban those that offer or practice it yes.Who knows maybe a life might be saved.

When your time is up its up ,why rush it?
Westside.

[Footlong]

b

This is not about what I myself do or don’t do. It is infact a topic about the banning of anyone who offers or looks for unprotected sex cause of the risks involved in that activity.

I am simply saying that the topic shouldn’t be just banned out right. Did you somehow miss that point???

With every discussion people become better informed, isn’t it better to share information of the different risks involved? which in turn helps people make a more informed choice in the activities they partake in.

There are a lot of people who believe that oral sex carries no risks.

By discussing topics like this the risks are highlighted.

Banning a topic is not a educated solution to a risk

Good man brother, it's good to see someone who's not afraid to voice his opinion on a point of principal, I agree with you totally.

[thehighwayman]

I don't think West meant to ban discussing the effects of unprotected sex but the banning of people looking for unprotected sex, not oral.And escorts advertising it.

It's good information about the owo. I already knew there were risks to owo but it's good for people who don't know to have the information. Then they can choose for themselves.

[Tommy Singh]

It was a pointless thread anyway, with the exception of the above information, I always wondered about that, as I love oral. I say it was a pointless thread because:
(a) Wev'e had it before.
(b) We all know what the outcomes going to be, the nopes apart from wildthang, were just trying to get up everybodies back I'd imagine.

As for we had it all before no we didnt.I havnt seen anyone banned for it here yet and god forbide i have looked enough on here.

Westside.

[Tommy Singh]

b


With every discussion people become better informed, isn’t it better to share information of the different risks involved? which in turn helps people make a more informed choice in the activities they partake in.

Share info?Fine if you have unprotected penetration you could get an STD some of which are incurable and fatal.Hows that for info shared?Maybe someone is consious enough to make a more infomed choice on this.

Westside.

[Tommy Singh]

I would have thought that it was pretty obvious that this thread was about unprotected penatrative sex, and not oral, in that case 95% of the escorts that advertise here would be banned.
Maybe Westside should have spelled it out...

when most ppl speak of sex they actaully mean sex.OWO is a bj ,not sex in my book.Sex is sex and a bj is a bj.

If you say to a girl lets have sex she is going to assume sex not bj.If you go to an escort and ask how much for sex ,she is going to say 170 or 250 or whatever .Seh is going to assume you actually mean sex.

To come along and say someone should be banned from offering or doing OWO is nonsense.

Westside.

[Wildthang]

As for we had it all before no we didnt.I havnt seen anyone banned for it here yet and god forbide i have looked enough on here.

Westside.

There was a warning sometime ago given out for promoting it... when infact the person was only highlighting the fact the the escort was offering it, so the punters would be better informed and be aware of the greater risks in seeing tht escort.

Will look and see if i can find it

[rover]

As for we had it all before no we didnt.I havnt seen anyone banned for it here yet and god forbide i have looked enough on here.

Westside.

The discussion has been on several times before, and by the way you said should be banned, not been banned, don't move the goalpost.

I just had a quick look back and there is endless discussion on the subject, here's on I just stopped on.

Search - Escort Ireland

No. 17 by Highwayman.