Can you

[Rachel Divine]

True but at numbers so low to go under the radar. And, are duos always on duo mode.

At risk of what so, loss of business?

Is it that she could be sharing one week and not another?

There can not be a rule for one thing and a different one for another in my opinion.

If one can not mention about another escort being in the apartment, neither duo reviews should be published, as there are two escorts working in the same apartment.

I believe it is common sense or I am too smart for this stuff.

[Rachel Divine]

I have visited girls that have shared with other girls I would like to visit or have seen before. But they did not get on or hated one another. So a duo was no going to happen. I think it is important that duo partners get on. Not necessarily a requirement to share an apartment.

I really don't care who is sharing with who and if they get on well or not.

I am making a different point here, for whoever wants to read it.

[IrishSarahBarra]

There can not be a rule for one thing and a different one for another in my opinion.

If one can not mention about another escort being in the apartment, neither duo reviews should be published, as there are two escorts working in the same apartment.

I believe it is common sense or I am too smart for this stuff.

You are too smart for this stuff Rachel!! What are you doing humouring me?!! At 1 in the morning ffs! (my battery died) ...I'm going to miss you so much, you know that x

Yep, you're right.

[IrishSarahBarra]

Well obviously I have missed the point here. Maybe you could spell it out for me?

Thanks in advance.

IDF.

Lu: saying that girls share in reviews would put them at risk.

Sarah: At risk from raids. Understandable.

Rachel: No. Nonsense. Duos would put girls at risk by that rule. Double standards.

[IrishSarahBarra]

Thanks IrishSarahBarra but my point was in my experience duo partners rarely share anyway.

Ah, "the not necessarily a requirement to share an apartment part." Yes, sorry IDF, missed that too.

So... if it's a single profile you can't say "This girl shares!!" If it's a duo you can't say "This girl does not share!!"

E.I. refuses to put anyone at undue risk but if an escort chooses it herself, by having a duo profile, that a client is obviously aware of, then that is her decision to make?

[IrishSarahBarra]

Good night you too babe

[Rachel Divine]

Thanks IrishSarahBarra but my point was in my experience duo partners rarely share anyway.

Duo partners rarely DO NOT SHARE.

I think the rule now to get a duo review is to have a profile up as a duo.

So, if I do duo with another lady, pay an advert as such and live in different places, how is that going to work out? Client books within 30 minutes, I or the other girl have to get out of own place, go to the other's to meet the guy. That's too much hassle and stupid. Doesn't work that way. I had 3somes now and again without sharing but not advertise duo with no girl...

In my experience I never heard of a duo to not share. But, I am an escort and you, as a John, know better..

[Rachel Divine]

You are too smart for this stuff Rachel!! What are you doing humouring me?!! At 1 in the morning ffs! (my battery died) ...I'm going to miss you so much, you know that x

Yep, you're right.

I am too smart to post here after I leave.. better things to do with my time than explaining to some white is not black.

[Curvaceous Kate]

leave a review if if you leave because you are not happy with the escort when the she opened the door and she had other escort friends there,

What worries me about this is that you are providing information and publishing it that can get the escort criminalised, loss of earnings and possibly deported. Maybe EI needs to provide a tick box that allows you to show there was an unexpected/unadvertised reason for you leaving, without declaring what that reason was?

It also means that Escorts that prefer to share for safety reasons are being put in danger, so it's a catch 22 situation. Escorts are not able to advertise that they share because of the law over here. It's not a case of lying for the sake of it.

[Zander]

What worries me about this is that you are providing information and publishing it that can get the escort criminalised, loss of earnings and possibly deported. Maybe EI needs to provide a tick box that allows you to show there was an unexpected/unadvertised reason for you leaving, without declaring what that reason was?

It also means that Escorts that prefer to share for safety reasons are being put in danger, so it's a catch 22 situation. Escorts are not able to advertise that they share because of the law over here. It's not a case of lying for the sake of it.

but surely the guy has a right to know this information too and thus avoid the escorts who share as it now puts the client at risk too.
Its a bad situation for all really