Page 66 of 101 FirstFirst ... 1656646566676876 ... LastLast
Results 651 to 660 of 1007

Thread: That Bill is now being Voted on

  1. #651
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    18,349

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dom Dunn View Post
    The legislation was already there to protect poor vulnerable trafficked girls and BOYS but they seem to have a problem finding any North or South!!
    Quote Originally Posted by Dom Dunn View Post
    Not sure what to make of this tbh not sure what point you are trying to make.
    You really make me sleepy.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Rachel Divine For This Useful Post:

    DrAlan (28-02-17)

  3. #652
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    16,039
    Blog Entries
    11

    Default

    Actually it is your own faults to some extent.

    Westside

  4. #653

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dom Dunn View Post
    On the contrary I think it is on the wane as the evidence mounts against it. With respect to the jocks they seem to have decided that they are more Scandinavian than British so maybe they will gobble it up!!!!Q
    not on the wave and I agree with that other guy, laura wont win her case and i'll put 1000 quid with you she wont, its will gain strength if anything. not what we want but they dont care

  5. #654
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    545
    Reviews
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rachel Divine View Post
    Let's say I learned a lot about men's behaviour. x


    I think there should be no eejit of punter like that in the first place. Two girls sharing shouldn't be a criminal offence, yet, it was (and still is) forever.. not this much fuss was made about it tho. Is that fair?


    I do and couldn't care less if it bothers you.


    Never will. Idiot!


    In that case, we have 700 + escorts, from which maybe 600 are in that position.

    x
    And don't we know it, what happened with Spain?.
    Last edited by MALCOLM; 28-02-17 at 14:59.

  6. #655
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    429
    Reviews
    60

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MissusAnderson View Post
    not on the wave and I agree with that other guy, laura wont win her case and i'll put 1000 quid with you she wont, its will gain strength if anything. not what we want but they dont care
    Your opinion on the legal challenge that Miss Lee is amounting is based on what exactly? Sound legal reasoning?

  7. #656
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    429
    Reviews
    60

    Default

    I think the point that Rachel is making is that the scene is in disarray at the moment due to certain types of ladies advertising. To be philosophical here, the law was basically brought in to combat them ladies and the profile of client that visits them. If all ladies were independent and all clients only visited such independent, established ladies then I believe it's fair enough to say that we weren't be in this situation today. The scene today is just so in the public eye because of such profiles leading to high volume of clients (and a certain type of client) every day in the same location (which every man & dog knows about) and its flaunted into the public sphere. Then on the other hand, you take the ladies such as Rachel (and many other established ladies) who provide a service in only luxury & quiet locations, extremely discreet and a private affair in all aspects.

  8. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to JayM93 For This Useful Post:

    moonlightbeauty (28-02-17), Rachel Divine (28-02-17)

  9. #657
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    602
    Reviews
    27

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JayM93 View Post
    I think the point that Rachel is making is that the scene is in disarray at the moment due to certain types of ladies advertising. To be philosophical here, the law was basically brought in to combat them ladies and the profile of client that visits them. If all ladies were independent and all clients only visited such independent, established ladies then I believe it's fair enough to say that we weren't be in this situation today. The scene today is just so in the public eye because of such profiles leading to high volume of clients (and a certain type of client) every day in the same location (which every man & dog knows about) and its flaunted into the public sphere. Then on the other hand, you take the ladies such as Rachel (and many other established ladies) who provide a service in only luxury & quiet locations, extremely discreet and a private affair in all aspects.
    This is all very arbitrary. How do you define "certain types of ladies"? What about the profile of clients who visit these "ladies"? Not every sex worker has the ability to offer services in a "luxury" location but in many cases they are genuine people who are fully deserving of having the right to earn a living. Also fully independent means I assume working solo. Some escorts do this and are comfortable to do so. However, many sex workers for obvious safety reasons like to work in groups i.e brothels. This is a human right and has been recognised in a unanimous vote by none other than the Canadian Supreme Court as such. The criterion should be that workers are free from coercion and bullying not were they locate their service provision once that is not unduly offensive to the general public.

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to Dom Dunn For This Useful Post:

    thewren (28-02-17)

  11. #658
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    18,349

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MALCOLM View Post
    And don't we know it, what happened with Spain?.
    Mind your god dam business.

  12. #659
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    18,349

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JayM93 View Post
    I think the point that Rachel is making is that the scene is in disarray at the moment due to certain types of ladies advertising. To be philosophical here, the law was basically brought in to combat them ladies and the profile of client that visits them. If all ladies were independent and all clients only visited such independent, established ladies then I believe it's fair enough to say that we weren't be in this situation today. The scene today is just so in the public eye because of such profiles leading to high volume of clients (and a certain type of client) every day in the same location (which every man & dog knows about) and its flaunted into the public sphere. Then on the other hand, you take the ladies such as Rachel (and many other established ladies) who provide a service in only luxury & quiet locations, extremely discreet and a private affair in all aspects.

  13. #660

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JayM93 View Post
    I think the point that Rachel is making is that the scene is in disarray at the moment due to certain types of ladies advertising. To be philosophical here, the law was basically brought in to combat them ladies and the profile of client that visits them. If all ladies were independent and all clients only visited such independent, established ladies then I believe it's fair enough to say that we weren't be in this situation today. The scene today is just so in the public eye because of such profiles leading to high volume of clients (and a certain type of client) every day in the same location (which every man & dog knows about) and its flaunted into the public sphere. Then on the other hand, you take the ladies such as Rachel (and many other established ladies) who provide a service in only luxury & quiet locations, extremely discreet and a private affair in all aspects.
    you do talk some bull, very few ladies are independent in the true sense of the word, we would be in this situation as these so called independent girls are involved in more than you think, god, you really are so naive and easy led, its not all black and white and what the escorts say on here you seem to believe, god help you, you dont have a clue to what is really going on

Page 66 of 101 FirstFirst ... 1656646566676876 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •