E-I's Advice on Escorts sharing

[LuckyLu]

Y would LuckLu have just one bag when she can have two
doesn't she look pretty and very happy

ha! I wish it was me in this pic
I take those are all $100 bills.

[RoyTheBoy]

I was thinking more about the problems some people create for themselves when they visit escorts. It is supposed to be a joyous occasion. Not an opportunity to carry out a random check of the premises.
Why stop at checking there is only one girl there? Hell, why not check that the electricity is installed properly and by a competent electrician? What about the plumbing? Is the structure of the building safe and does it have the relevant fire-safety certificate? And so on. And so on!

I could not tell if a escort was sharing or not but the burning smell of bacon and eggs and noise from the kitchen can give it away and knocking on the bedroom door to tell her that the Tea is ready is not being discreet either, why do they give themselves up so easy Steve?

[LuckyLu]

As far as I understand it it would still be illegal because the law is worded so vaguely and broadly. Two people working in the same location regardless of whether it's some where they own, rent, a hotel room or a private out-call location. As long as two escorts are sharing the premises, whether that's for sex or even using other facilities to get ready for clients like showers I think, it's illegal. Ugly Mugs recently did an analysis of convictions for brothel-keeping and found that 90%+ of those convicted were escorts, not pimps, traffickers or other third parties. It's a completely unjust law!

I agree with you. The newly enforced law put your safety in jeopardy pushing you towards working alone.
As if being independent was not enough, now you need to work alone or face the dilemma of breaking the law.
I cannot begin to comprehend what were they thinking when introducing it.

And yes, I have amended the paragraph.
The wording in it was unfortunate and needed some clearing.
xxx

[bestie]

it is a good question and here is the answer:

We consider a duo two advertisers providing service for one client.
A brothel, in our interpretation would be when 2 different clients are seen at the same time by two different advertisers working together. - this will not be suitable content for publishing in a review.

Let me stress it again, the link and quote provided was not a legal advice for anyone at any point in time, it was a guidance to explain why we would not publish a review.

I hope this helps.

The true interpretation in the laws eyes is two escorts who are actively working together, a duo is the same as in majority of cases they both share then it is illegal, it has nothing to do with whether there are two clients or one in the apartment, in fact there doesn't have to be any, as long as the two girls are actively selling their services from the same premises, its a brothel. I can't understand why you could publish a review for a duo in these circumstances as its contradictory for a start.

[bestie]

I agree with you. The new law put your safety in jeopardy pushing you towards working alone.
As if being independent was not enough, now you need to work alone or face the dilemma of breaking the law.
I cannot begin to comprehend what were they thinking when introducing it.

And yes, I have amended the paragraph.
The wording in it was unfortunate and needed some clearing.
xxx

this is not a new law though, its been around for yonks, its just it was never enforced before not like now

[LuckyLu]

The true interpretation in the laws eyes is two escorts who are actively working together, a duo is the same as in majority of cases they both share then it is illegal, it has nothing to do with whether there are two clients or one in the apartment, in fact there doesn't have to be any, as long as the two girls are actively selling their services from the same premises, its a brothel. I can't understand why you could publish a review for a duo in these circumstances as its contradictory for a start.

correct. this is the legal take you are referring to.

I am however explaining the reviewing rules.

let me clear this one:
If an advertiser is sharing an apartment with a friend, but have separate adverts, we will not publish a review where there is an implication of 2 or more girls working together.
If 2 advertisers choose to advertise openly as a duo, we do not face this dilemma and can publish the review.

[LuckyLu]

this is not a new law though, its been around for yonks, its just it was never enforced before not like now

again, as stated previously, not legally qualified.
I amended my quote, thank you for pointing this one out.

( "the new law" changed to "the newly enforced law" )

[bollocks]

ok thanks for that, so leave the Escorts apartment without receiving any service and report them to the Police

and Revenue, and immigration authorities, and,,,,,and,,,,and

[bollocks]

it is a good question and here is the answer:

We consider a duo two advertisers providing service for one client.
A brothel, in our interpretation would be when 2 different clients are seen at the same time by two different advertisers working together. - this will not be suitable content for publishing in a review.

Let me stress it again, the link and quote provided was not a legal advice for anyone at any point in time, it was a guidance to explain why we would not publish a review.

I hope this helps.

Just wondering how massage parlours work. They all offer happy endings.

[scouserpete]

sounds like a serious case of covering ones asses, obviously to do with the pending legislation regarding the purchasing of sex. if a punter gets caught and says he got the info off e-i they have themselves covered with this one simple paragraph