Reviewing a review. What's your view..

[LuckyLu]

I should really edit my posts better that should read arseholes not armholes And last word should read undeserved

sorted.

[circumcised guy]

Don't mean to burst any bubbles or bruise any egos but from what I read between the lines, the downvotes are NOT for Leyla, they are for the reviewer and the field report he has written.

The thumbs up or down have no bearing on EOTM competition or the ladies reputation.

Well that's how I read it anyway. If I see a thumbs down, (once it's not obviously a review written in pigeon English by the escort herself or her friends), IMO it is aimed squarely at the reviewer.

You and your review are not found to be helpful, accurate or trustworthy. NOT the lady or her service.

You could have a point and maybe the rating is aimed at the receiver. But even at that speaking for myself that would still be an unjust rating because OK maybe my review might not have been the most helpful but I can assure anyone that is is totally accurate and truthful. If I was unhappy with any part of my visit then I would say so.
And if a lady wasn't worth seeing I would show that in my rateings. But i also think there would be some guys would judge the thumbs down against the lady.

[circumcised guy]

sorted.

Cheers lu

[KnickerSnifferDublin2016]

Don't mean to burst any bubbles or bruise any egos but from what I read between the lines, the downvotes are NOT for Leyla, they are for the reviewer and the field report he has written.

The thumbs up or down have no bearing on EOTM competition or the ladies reputation.

Well that's how I read it anyway. If I see a thumbs down, (once it's not obviously a review written in pigeon English by the escort herself or her friends), IMO it is aimed squarely at the reviewer.

You and your review are not found to be helpful, accurate or trustworthy. NOT the lady or her service.

Willie is a legit reviewer.

[collinsp]

On a similar topic (maybe it needs it's own thread), it seems when there are negative reviews, they fall into one of two categories - 1: the reviewer genuinely had a bad experience despite their best efforts. 2: the review was written out of spite because the appointment went wrong due to some fault of their own (hygiene problems, etc).

I find these forums very useful. Having been here a few months I've become familiar with a lot of the regulars, and have ideas about who's opinions I value, etc (from posts on the forum, from reviews, and from PM contacts). If I'm looking at reviews the first thing I'll do is scan the names and see if I recognise anyone that falls into that category.

The problem with this is that, proportionately, the forum regulars are in the minority. The vast majority of reviews are by people who don't engage in the community section.

I've just gotten back from an appointment. Choosing to arrange that appointment was based purely on the fact that familiar names rated this lady very highly. But, in amongst the reviews I spotted some negative reviews. Having now visited the girl I know for sure that some of the negative comments are utter nonsense. UTTER nonsense. And though the girl has the right-to-reply, her percentage ratings are still affected.

So, is there an argument to park reviews that are quite clearly spiteful? Not necessarily delete them, just put them somewhere else and not factor in their associated score to the overall percentage rating?

It's the latter point - the percentage rating - is the important thing here. Those of us who take time to read the reviews can smell a spiteful review from a mile away. There may be plenty of others who won't, or who will just move onto the next person, because they see that some negative reviews are left.

Remember, this is the girls' livelihoods we're talking about here, and reviews are, IMO, such an important thing.

Or, am I just being over-sensitive on their behalves? (it is frustrating though).

[The D Man]

Don't mean to burst any bubbles or bruise any egos but from what I read between the lines, the downvotes are NOT for Leyla, they are for the reviewer and the field report he has written.

The thumbs up or down have no bearing on EOTM competition or the ladies reputation.

Well that's how I read it anyway. If I see a thumbs down, (once it's not obviously a review written in pigeon English by the escort herself or her friends), IMO it is aimed squarely at the reviewer.

You and your review are not found to be helpful, accurate or trustworthy. NOT the lady or her service.

Not everybody will look at the situation the way you do. The escort will also be affected as it is a review for her.

Willie is a legit reviewer.

Willie is one of the soundest lads here. I would have no questions about his reviews.

On a similar topic (maybe it needs it's own thread), it seems when there are negative reviews, they fall into one of two categories - 1: the reviewer genuinely had a bad experience despite their best efforts. 2: the review was written out of spite because the appointment went wrong due to some fault of their own (hygiene problems, etc).

I find these forums very useful. Having been here a few months I've become familiar with a lot of the regulars, and have ideas about who's opinions I value, etc (from posts on the forum, from reviews, and from PM contacts). If I'm looking at reviews the first thing I'll do is scan the names and see if I recognise anyone that falls into that category.

The problem with this is that, proportionately, the forum regulars are in the minority. The vast majority of reviews are by people who don't engage in the community section.

I've just gotten back from an appointment. Choosing to arrange that appointment was based purely on the fact that familiar names rated this lady very highly. But, in amongst the reviews I spotted some negative reviews. Having now visited the girl I know for sure that some of the negative comments are utter nonsense. UTTER nonsense. And though the girl has the right-to-reply, her percentage ratings are still affected.

So, is there an argument to park reviews that are quite clearly spiteful? Not necessarily delete them, just put them somewhere else and not factor in their associated score to the overall percentage rating?

It's the latter point - the percentage rating - is the important thing here. Those of us who take time to read the reviews can smell a spiteful review from a mile away. There may be plenty of others who won't, or who will just move onto the next person, because they see that some negative reviews are left.

Remember, this is the girls' livelihoods we're talking about here, and reviews are, IMO, such an important thing.

Or, am I just being over-sensitive on their behalves? (it is frustrating though).

The really sad thing is that some people really don't care about anything else other than themselves. Small mindedness, hateful individuals.

They think " oh she is very popular all of a sudden I must bring her down"

As for thumbs up or thumbs down it is a worthless gimmick.

[KnickerSnifferDublin2016]

Not everybody will look at the situation the way you do. The escort will also be affected as it is a review for her.






Willie is one of the soundest lads here. I would have no questions about his reviews.








The really sad thing is that some people really don't care about anything else other than themselves. Small mindedness, hateful individuals.

They think " oh she is very popular all of a sudden I must bring her down"

As for thumbs up or thumbs down it is a worthless gimmick.

One guy on here lets call him "sylvester stallone" he reports post after post after post its fucking pathetic. Its a way of censoring the site to get brownie points with crinkly hookers. Grow a pair man.