Page 3 of 12 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 113

Thread: Can you not tell?

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    977
    Reviews
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rachel Divine View Post
    How honest are the clients, Kate?

    Them time wasters, them not very ''fresh'' etc etc ..

    Most of them guys wouldn't get a girl if it wasn't to pay for, no offence. Honestly, they should be more grateful and less moaning. x
    We'll try to keep the moaning down next time, got it

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    14,758
    Blog Entries
    18

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SophieX View Post
    True, if only there was enough hours in the day .... 




    If its an old photo why you using it. kate, i would've loved to have you at my school, even just to discipline you. 


    I'm off out for a spin and to grab some lunch...... you's really are too easy on here.....


    Besos
    Sophie I didn't write that much. You just had to read and not just have a look at the pictures. It's not that hard.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    14,758
    Blog Entries
    18

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by themanofwar View Post
    pass no heed on them kate, they're just taking the mickey a bit, you're doing fine as you are so why change anything unless you really want to of course
    Oh gosh this is not me having a crisis or wanting to change. I've managed successfully for several years keeping to my principles, but I just don't get why you guys moan about photo shopping and then applauded it almost in the same breath. I was trying to open some eyes,

    I'm not fussed about the wind ups. There is only one reason why anyone would want to deflect from the real purpose of this thread and I'm not surprised at who is doing it at all, in fact to be expected.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    22,109
    Reviews
    73

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by themanofwar View Post
    thats a bit harsh, visiting escorts make guys lazy so they don't bother much while
    most have a girl, they call it a wife i think
    That,s the reality of what the escorts think of us tbh
    If any of the lads here think that an escort has the hots for them need a real kick up the arse
    They love our money


    " WE ARE CONNACHT "

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to willie wacker For This Useful Post:


  6. #25
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    5,845

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Curvaceous Kate View Post
    As someone who has been working with photoshop and Lightroom now for some time I can see when a photo has been tampered with and find it quite astonishing sometimes when you guys can't see it and rave about the photo's. I'm not pointing the finger at any photo's in particular and to be honest, it's more likely to be the photographer getting over zealous than the fault of the sex worker, but I can't work out why on one hand you guys encourage it and on the other complain about it. What's the score?

    I've had a play with a couple of old photo's that I've used in the past, that were untouched and edited them to show you the before and after. I have blurred my face on the originals otherwise no other alterations. (brave or stupid I'm not sure lol).

    So... tell me when I take photo's in the future. Should I photoshop them like I have here or keep closer to the truth?

    Attachment 117012Attachment 117013 and Attachment 117014Attachment 117015
    My opinion is that photoshopping to remove 'distinguishing' marks for reasons of discretion is acceptable. I wouldn't opt for photoshopping that made me look like a supermodel, as I'm not a supermodel, so why mislead guys with photos that bear only a passing resemblance to me?

    Sandy x
    In memory of an awesome woman Laura Lee RIP
    It's so difficult to articulate just how much she meant. Inspirational, brave and irreplaceable - our hero.
    Please do what you can for her daughter. Deeply appreciated.
    https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/glasgaelauralee

  7. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Sexy Sandy 69 For This Useful Post:

    alcatel (11-06-16), Curvaceous Kate (09-06-16), funlover12 (09-06-16), JAMESCORK (09-06-16), SophieX (09-06-16)

  8. #26
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    22,109
    Reviews
    73

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by zilch View Post
    Wtf you talking about Willis..........
    Every escort has the hots for meeeeeeeee coz I'm such a charming and ahemmmmm good looking f*cker
    Ok maybe you only being such a charmer like

    I can only be sssoooo jealous


    " WE ARE CONNACHT "

  9. #27
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    1,027
    Reviews
    11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rachel Divine View Post

    Most of them guys wouldn't get a girl if it wasn't to pay for, no offence. Honestly, they should be more grateful and less moaning. x
    Lol, don't ever change Rachel

    Quote Originally Posted by Curvaceous Kate View Post
    As someone who has been working with photoshop and Lightroom now for some time I can see when a photo has been tampered with and find it quite astonishing sometimes when you guys can't see it and rave about the photo's. I'm not pointing the finger at any photo's in particular and to be honest, it's more likely to be the photographer getting over zealous than the fault of the sex worker, but I can't work out why on one hand you guys encourage it and on the other complain about it. What's the score?

    I've had a play with a couple of old photo's that I've used in the past, that were untouched and edited them to show you the before and after. I have blurred my face on the originals otherwise no other alterations. (brave or stupid I'm not sure lol).

    So... tell me when I take photo's in the future. Should I photoshop them like I have here or keep closer to the truth?

    Attachment 117012Attachment 117013 and Attachment 117014Attachment 117015
    Interesting topic Kate and brave of you to bring it up. As others have said, if a poster starts an appreciation thread for an escort it would be churlish and bad manners to point out how shopped the photos are. It would hardly help encourage escorts to contribute to the forum either.
    Everyone can probably tell by now to what degree any photos are altered. In my opinion escorts like
    Alexia Montero, https://www.escort-ireland.com/escor...le-escort.html
    Nicole https://www.escort-ireland.com/escor...le-escort.html
    and many others get it right with glamour shots on their profile and untouched photos in their private albums. I know selfies can be retouched too, but they help give a fuller idea of who to expect.

  10. #28
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    2,396
    Reviews
    307

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SophieX View Post

    If i had the time, i'd open a school for escorts and teach them. If it was legit i mean. 😂


    One of you is exactly the right number.
    Help Keyla fund her battle with cancer - give what you can spare.

    https://gofund.me/8e340537

  11. #29
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    14,758
    Blog Entries
    18

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FullLife View Post
    Lol, don't ever change Rachel



    Interesting topic Kate and brave of you to bring it up. As others have said, if a poster starts an appreciation thread for an escort it would be churlish and bad manners to point out how shopped the photos are. It would hardly help encourage escorts to contribute to the forum either.
    Everyone can probably tell by now to what degree any photos are altered. In my opinion escorts like
    Alexia Montero, https://www.escort-ireland.com/escor...le-escort.html
    Nicole https://www.escort-ireland.com/escor...le-escort.html
    and many others get it right with glamour shots on their profile and untouched photos in their private albums. I know selfies can be retouched too, but they help give a fuller idea of who to expect.
    No one would expect anyone to point the finger and point out where the obvious changes have been made, but does that mean that you have to add to the post so there are 5 or 6 pages long of appreciation for the images? Do some of you do that knowing that they are not representative and are you doing it to gain favour or because you are trying to help the person or out of sarcasm?

    I mean you guys have no right to complain is really the point. How can you complain when actively encouraging it? It really does give everyone full reign to do whatever they want and why should they care if it bothers you or not when in my eyes it makes you much worse.

    Mind you having said all that it seems that the majority here don't actually read either, so it's a lost cause.

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to Curvaceous Kate For This Useful Post:

    FullLife (09-06-16)

  13. #30
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    10,794
    Reviews
    10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by General Lee Awesome View Post
    I assume most people can tell the difference Kate but clients are stuck in a catch 22 imo.

    When there are "Xxx has new pictures, wow" threads posted, if the pics are photoshopped, even just a little, we can hardly say anything negative and comment on the fact that some photographers make girls look like cartoons with freaky looking features and impossible waistlines. (There seems to be one studio in particular that does a complete horror job on photoshopping ive noticed).

    I personally prefer natural pics with minimal photoshop and the selfie type pic, more accurate representation.

    Also, those overly photoshopped pics i refer to, they actually turn me off, because in alot of cases, they warp the girls features and imo make her less attractive than she actually is, which is a shame.

    Just my two cents.

    I do understand ladies photoshop to blend skin tone, blemishes, tattoos etc and thats fine, but others……
    I agree mostly, except the bit I highlighted, I dont agree with that, it certainly isnt fine but theres no getting away from that epidemic in the paid for sex scene worldwide. its one thing photoshopping a girl who will only exist on the computer/in magazines for satisfying a mans desires in his imagination and she is not available for escorting, its another thing using photoshop in an escorts picture AT ALL!

    the imaginary girl like in a magazine is for wanking to/enjoying looking at, the escorts ad is for BOOKING HER in real life and should be a real life representation of her.

Page 3 of 12 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •