Results 1 to 10 of 110

Thread: New Bill

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    3,360

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SteveB View Post
    Interestingly, the bill does not differentiate between an escort or a long-term girlfriend or even a wife. It just makes paying for sex illegal.
    yea i agree and theres more than one way to skin a cat. a client pays the escort with cash, the married man pays his wife with health insurance or a mortgage on the home etc. there is a transaction of assets, just not in cash.

    its amazing how prejudice people are. They see marriage as a morally responsible thing and not a form of prostitution both ways.
    "The mass of men live lives of quiet desperation" - Henry David Thoreau.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    3,360

    Default

    another thing is you screw a woman for free and its legal. but pay for it and its not. so i go into a nightclub and pull a woman and its all legal. pathetic really.

    they should legalize it and tax it, but that wont happen because all the married women will put up a fuss
    "The mass of men live lives of quiet desperation" - Henry David Thoreau.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    637
    Reviews
    14

    Default

    As others have said, how about guys who are in relationships or married?

    Lets be honest, and this is probably a terrible way to look at it (I most certainly don't have this view myself), but there is a monetary cost to you being in a relationship vs being single. Eating out, extra food, extra petrol/diesel etc. Given that any couple should be having regular sex, and that money changes hands on a regular basis (not directly for sex mind you). Could that qualify as purchasing sex, and thus be illegal under this law?

    It really would be nice if the government would just fuck off and leave us all alone at times, this is what you get when you give your government too much power.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Zealot7 For This Useful Post:

    Irish Siobhan (30-01-15)

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    3,360

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zealot7 View Post
    As others have said, how about guys who are in relationships or married?

    Lets be honest, and this is probably a terrible way to look at it (I most certainly don't have this view myself), but there is a monetary cost to you being in a relationship vs being single. Eating out, extra food, extra petrol/diesel etc. Given that any couple should be having regular sex, and that money changes hands on a regular basis (not directly for sex mind you). Could that qualify as purchasing sex, and thus be illegal under this law?

    It really would be nice if the government would just fuck off and leave us all alone at times, this is what you get when you give your government too much power.
    they wont prosecute you for being married. they are trying to incentivize marriage because it produces kids which an economy needs.

    but technically you are right. you buy services from your wife and your wife buys services from you, of which you call marriage or love. you both trade with each other just not in cash.

    being extremely pedantic, everything is a form of prostitution. you work as in you provide a service just as an escort does for a price.

    we are all prostitutes said laing.
    "The mass of men live lives of quiet desperation" - Henry David Thoreau.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •