Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 30 of 30

Thread: Criminalising punters: Talk on Radio

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    10,794
    Reviews
    10

    Default

    its obvious these people dont give two hapenny fucks about views which dont agree with theirs, it would be much better use of resources to get the minister for justice kicked out of her job and framed just like the way the previous minister for justice alan shatter was with the GSOC shite scandal. interesting that he was fairly blase about the whole thing and leaning towards the status quo, then suddenly he's involved in a scandal and booted out on his arse, and where the next minister for justice is staunchly for the fucked up new laws.... the whole thing stinks of shite, think about the timing...

    its like a watergate scandal!
    Last edited by funlover12; 12-12-14 at 05:36.

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to funlover12 For This Useful Post:

    Escort AdvertiserFetishCherry (12-12-14), The Equalizer (13-12-14)

  3. #22
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    1,369
    Blog Entries
    1
    Reviews
    41

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BBCAndy View Post
    .. to buy sex ...

    Andy

    Andy you may have the wrong website, we like to buy Time and Companionship


    Mmmm-hmm




  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Larrii For This Useful Post:

    funlover12 (12-12-14), talkabout (12-12-14)

  5. #23
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    10,794
    Reviews
    10

    Default

    someone needs to bring up that you cant punish the client and not the sex worker, youre just basically using the sex workers as bait then (aka state sponsored pimping) if there was nobody selling sex then there would be no clients, its fucked how a couple of countries get away with this including northern ireland now

    thats something that needs to be talked about.
    Last edited by funlover12; 12-12-14 at 09:07.

  6. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to funlover12 For This Useful Post:

    Larrii (12-12-14), talkabout (12-12-14)

  7. #24
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    10,794
    Reviews
    10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by funlover12 View Post
    someone needs to bring up that you cant punish the client and not the sex worker, youre just basically using the sex workers as bait then (aka state sponsored pimping) if there was nobody selling sex then there would be no clients, its fucked how a couple of countries get away with this including northern ireland now

    thats something that needs to be talked about.
    they see prostitution as scum, and a 'vice' of society and want to get married men to stop using them because they think they will be saving homes and marriages, but the irony is they will be destroying more now, these laws are ripe for blackmail (well more than they already are) where as now its one persons word against another (client vs pimp/escort and who is wifey more likely to believe, husband or these?) now it will be backed by law (wifey will be going with the police now over what the husband says) so what could have been sorted out before now wont be able to be, which will lead to more wrecked homes not less

    this is an angle I have not heard anything about before, if someone (some people, I mean clients in this case) wants something they will do it regardless, and fuck the consequences. wont someone please think of the children!
    daddy cant otherwise he wouldnt be sticking cock in sex workers before the change in law
    Last edited by funlover12; 12-12-14 at 09:26.

  8. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to funlover12 For This Useful Post:

    Curvaceous Kate (12-12-14), Escort AdvertiserFetishCherry (12-12-14)

  9. Default

    Andy, if you're serious about this, and I'll do you the courtesy of assuming that you are, here are two things you need to follow up on:

    1. Follow The Money (eg Ruhama, Sisters of Mercy, Magdalene Laundries)
    2. Ask why Norway is thinking of abandoning the Nordic Model after only a few years (unintended consequences)

  10. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to liffey For This Useful Post:

    Curvaceous Kate (12-12-14), the traveller (13-12-14)

  11. #26

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by funlover12 View Post
    they see prostitution as scum, and a 'vice' of society and want to get married men to stop using them because they think they will be saving homes and marriages, but the irony is they will be destroying more now, these laws are ripe for blackmail (well more than they already are) where as now its one persons word against another (client vs pimp/escort and who is wifey more likely to believe, husband or these?) now it will be backed by law (wifey will be going with the police now over what the husband says) so what could have been sorted out before now wont be able to be, which will lead to more wrecked homes not less


    this is an angle I have not heard anything about before, if someone (some people, I mean clients in this case) wants something they will do it regardless, and fuck the consequences. wont someone please think of the children!
    daddy cant otherwise he wouldnt be sticking cock in sex workers before the change in law

    I agree with u 100% . I noticed always when is an article about prostitutes in newspapers (online) or magazines etc the most hateful comments towards escorts coming from women. They consider us a 'danger' for them families and if we thinking the feminist groups and ideas plus minister of justice is woman too i understand why they wanted them men to stop visiting us.(leaving aside the bullshit with pimps and trafficked women). They are so stupid and totally wrong. If guys will dont go to escorts they will find what they looking for in other places: a coleg from work, a girl in a club or on the street etc and will be more dangerous for them relation as that girls might want them man for good , at list an escort want just his money and send them man back home lol. Silly them
    Always Smile

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to FetishCherry For This Useful Post:

    Prickly (12-12-14)

  13. #27
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    1,153
    Reviews
    40

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SmallHorn View Post
    I get your point, but he is looking for the clients view, what they will do when laws are introduced.
    The general public wont be able to answer those questions.
    Carry on regardless.

    (A line from a Beautiful South song I believe).

  14. #28
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    1,153
    Reviews
    40

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FetishCherry View Post
    I agree with u 100% . I noticed always when is an article about prostitutes in newspapers (online) or magazines etc the most hateful comments towards escorts coming from women. They consider us a 'danger' for them families and if we thinking the feminist groups and ideas plus minister of justice is woman too i understand why they wanted them men to stop visiting us.(leaving aside the bullshit with pimps and trafficked women). They are so stupid and totally wrong. If guys will dont go to escorts they will find what they looking for in other places: a coleg from work, a girl in a club or on the street etc and will be more dangerous for them relation as that girls might want them man for good , at list an escort want just his money and send them man back home lol. Silly them
    A lot of men will be spending a lot more time at home in bed with their good friend -"Palm".

  15. #29
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    14,758
    Blog Entries
    18

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by funlover12 View Post
    someone needs to bring up that you cant punish the client and not the sex worker, youre just basically using the sex workers as bait then (aka state sponsored pimping) if there was nobody selling sex then there would be no clients, its fucked how a couple of countries get away with this including northern ireland now

    thats something that needs to be talked about.
    They know that we get punished indirectly. they are getting us via our stability (we won't have any) that's financial and physical, loss of wages and lack of safety.

  16. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Curvaceous Kate For This Useful Post:

    Melindablondey (13-12-14), talkabout (13-12-14)

  17. #30
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    603
    Reviews
    19

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by liffey View Post
    Andy, if you're serious about this, and I'll do you the courtesy of assuming that you are, here are two things you need to follow up on:

    1. Follow The Money (eg Ruhama, Sisters of Mercy, Magdalene Laundries)
    2. Ask why Norway is thinking of abandoning the Nordic Model after only a few years (unintended consequences)
    Also
    the way the Justice committee was set up,
    the attitudes of committee members,
    who were invited to present,
    the incorrect labeling of presenters,
    the way non-supporters of torl were treated,
    why were no clients invited to present,
    why were current sex workers only allowed to present when they protested outside Lienster house,
    why did Bachik lie on national radio

  18. The Following User Says Thank You to the traveller For This Useful Post:

    The Equalizer (13-12-14)

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •