Hyperbole reviews and 'Fresh Meat'

[Larrii]

Just seen Kendra's thread 'Fresh Meat' in the General Chat section. I was discussing something similar to this, this morning with one of the Ad Staff members. We receive about 80 reviews a day, and from reading through them, clients seem to be visiting a lot of the younger, new, less experienced escorts. It seems that clients are very eager to point out every flaw in their service, ...

That's a good shpiel Sam. There are ladies who are more proactive than others, and more proactive means they have experience and confidence. They know how to play, or they can act well. We love them. There's nothing more boring than a lady who will just lie back and think of (whatever) and let you do whatever.

Reviewing a passive lady is a real challenge. You know she needs good reviews, she means no harm, and everyone has to start somewhere. But you paid your money, spent time getting there, took your time with her, but couldn't recommend her to your best friend - which is what reviews are all about.

I agree about hyperbole, good or bad - maybe a 24-hour cooling off period between the visit and posting the review would help?

[Jakek]

I recently had a perfectly good review deleted. It wasn't a negative review, it showed as a neutral. No hyperbole or emotive or insulting language or comments - just factual summary and acknowledging that as it was a cheap punt that it wasn't bad value.

If this type of review is not acceptable then frankly the review system isn't worth having or even looking at - I see dozens of the polemic reviews either by guys who fall in love with every girl or those who obviously turn up late or drunk and then extract revenge by posting a damming review. The more balanced reviews are the ones worth reading