Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Verified photos - suggested improvement

  1. Default Verified photos - suggested improvement

    Verified photos only guarantee that it is the girl in the photo, not that she actually looks like that. Given that a lot no longer allow reviews or switch the capability to review once the secret is out, could there be a facility to only give green colour verified approval to those that are the actual girl/ fella and are accurate.

    Regards

    Hairy back

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    31,568

    Default

    The green E-I logo on the photos is a watermark, NOT a verification mark. Check at the top of the escort profiles for verified, not verified or awaiting verification.

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to samlad For This Useful Post:

    Lara Mills (31-01-14)

  4. Default

    Thanks for that, but the point is that some are verified, don't look like there picture and don't allow reviews

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to Hairy back For This Useful Post:

    ana massage (13-09-13)

  6. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    31,568

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hairy back View Post
    Thanks for that, but the point is that some are verified, don't look like there picture and don't allow reviews
    The verification system is more of a guide line as we don't personally meet each escort do ensure that their pictures are accurate; we have to work of a verification image that the escort sends in with their face visible, and they need to hold a sign with 'Escort-Ireland' and the time and date written on it. We compare this image to the likeness of the escort in the photos, and quite often, we blur the images on the escorts' requests. We don't know if the images are heavily airbrushed, if they are outdated or if someone else is 'borrowing' the verified profile to work from, but that is ultimately down to you to decide whether you wish to continue with the appointment or not if you arrive and it isn't who you were expecting. If you do stay, bear in mind that you have been deceived thus far.

  7. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to samlad For This Useful Post:

    kitty escort (03-02-14), funlover12 (14-09-13), zoozoozoo (04-09-13)

  8. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    1,722

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hairy back View Post
    Verified photos only guarantee that it is the girl in the photo, not that she actually looks like that. Given that a lot no longer allow reviews or switch the capability to review once the secret is out, could there be a facility to only give green colour verified approval to those that are the actual girl/ fella and are accurate.

    Regards

    Hairy back
    On my profile I do not show my face for discretion purposes but to get my profile verified I had to send E-I my pictures but without the big black dot and also another picture of me holding a sign up with Escort-Ireland and the date aswell as it being a full front face pic so they can then compare that to the pics on my profile which for me was verified. I think that's all they can do really, no system in place is perfect and that goes for any site of this nature.

    If you arrive at a ladies work place and your not happy with how she looks or that she is not the lady in the pics then you can simply walk away.
    Last edited by Kendra; 13-09-13 at 14:11.

  9. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Kendra For This Useful Post:

    Candy Sweet (04-02-14), Lara Mills (31-01-14), Nicole (13-09-13), pattya (13-09-13), samlad (13-09-13), Simina Escort (12-02-14)

  10. #6

    Default

    I find it too unnuanced to be practical, saying "If you arrive at a ladies work place and your not happy with how she looks or that she is not the lady in the pics then you can simply walk away". An escort can let you in, covered in a bathrobe until after the client pays. The face alone is often not enough to assess whether the photos are at all acurate. We all know that clients don't only select an escort on the energy that emanates from her smile.

    Escorts should not be allowed to post any picture that wasn't verified by way of the said date system, and that from registration, so not only after a complaint. I visited an escort, today, whose body was ten years older than in her pictures, while these, on this site, state to have been verified as being 'Genuine Photos'. That a photo is not taken from some other escort/site/country/etc. is also not enough reason to allow for it. For all intents and purposes, an escort who is older than in her picture (to the effect that it makes a difference to a client - and those escorts know full well why they are posting old photos) is another woman, not just one who is older.

    I partly agree with the notion that the fact that an escort refuses to be reviewed can be seen as a negative signal, but the review policy is not explained that way. The rules give the non-review option a positive swing, to the advantage of the escort (which I fully understand). That the system is very easy to abuse should be included as a warning.

  11. Default

    Sorry, it's NOT a watermark, it's a logo - two totally different things.

    A watermark is transparent - usually more than 70% so and is usually in the centre of an image. A logo is a totally opaque badge usually placed in one corner of a photograph.

    Quote Originally Posted by samlad View Post
    The green E-I logo on the photos is a watermark, NOT a verification mark. Check at the top of the escort profiles for verified, not verified or awaiting verification.
    "All the world's a stage and all the men and women merely players" ~ Jaques | As You Like It | Shakespeare

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •