Banned Reviewers

[Rachel Divine]

The point of most self bans is to prevent people from interacting and reviewing. If someone is banned for a breach of rules or trolling, they should lose all privileges and we already have enough factors to consider in place when reviews come in without having to worry about who is banned or not on top of that.

There are no 'genuine' reviewers on an anonymous forum as even some 'trusted reviewers' were found to be abusing their position, and this still goes on because people with many reviews are still sort of regarded as 'genuine' when we know this isn't always the case.

What I am saying is , an reviewer should not obey the forum rules , as not everyone is so calm like yourself and deal with situation different , example getting into an argument and get banned because he expressed his view.

You might not make the difference between genuine and not , but I do because I actually meet this genuine clients/reviewers.