for rejecting the TORL proposal , not because it was the 'right' decision , but because most of the Dublin City Council members were actually willing to take a critical look at the evidence of the 'success' of the Model and question it. Based on the contradictory evidence of the Swedish Model and the practical experience of social issues that some of the Members had , it made complete logical sense not to drive an already hazardous source of income further underground and so rejected the TORL proposal .
In fairness to most of the various speakers , their primary concern is sexworker safety not blind faith in an ideaology .
Unsurprisingly,the Labour contingent still played the political game and pushed for their party manifesto policy like the good little party politicians that they are.
And as for FF's Jim O Callaghan's prehistoric remark 'no person would make a voluntary choice to get into prostitution' amid his admission that he didn't know enough about the Swedish Model and prostitution in general should have meant his own personal vote abstension ( Four others who presumably couldn't arrive on one side or the other , responsibly abstained , to their credit ) but O'Sullivan voted anyway.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vgbz6JrFdqw
DCC debate only underlines what a whitewash the JOC Meetings have been - when 'mere' councillors can have an informed debate and a healthy skepticism of what marketing campaigns are trying to sell them ,it only goes to show the scant negligent responsibility many members of the JOC have shown towards the safety of sex workers in deference to their own selfish ideaologies.
Whilst ,of course , acting in the best interests of the victims, don't you know......
Kudos to the DCC ,not necessarily for their decision but for their willingness to examine the evidence...