"I won't go into details" "Treat with respect" yawn, yawn, zzzzzzzzzzzzz

[experiencedguy]

Just to clarify some points. 1. Mucker did not leave the opening post - I did. 2. If I was to make a list of the information I would like to see included that doesn't leave me bored - and a similiar number of users parroted off that list to the extent that they currently parrot the two catchphrases I mentioned - then (just like now) I'd get bored quick enough. 3. You mention tolerance but you can't seem to tolerate the fact that I find this constant repetition boring. 4. To answer your question directly - I do not want to be bored by these reviews. You say the opposite is stimulation (is there an implication that you disapprove of either mental or physical stimulation?) and yes, the reason I read reviews is that I use them to decide if I'd like to meet an escort, so in my case well-written reviews are helpful. 5. You query why I would 'question the reason' why the reviewer leaves such a review and ask if it is on this one basis of not divulging explicit facts? Answer to that is NO. You're reading way too much into it - taking it personally perhaps? 6. You will note that "the odd renegade?" has a question mark - it's not a statement. 7. Like I said initially, treating Escorts with respect should be par for the course (it is for me) and the urgings in reviews don't assist me one iota and are, in my opinion, a possible effort at appearing patrician on behalf of the writer and therefore boring to me.

1: Agreed. I've apologised to him already.

2: I don't care.

3: See point 2.

4: Boredom is subjective. See point 2.

5:

Ok some escorts request no sexually explicit reviews and that's fair enough and should be respected but in other instances I'd question the reason for the review if the reviewer "won't go into details".

What other assumption are we to make?

6: Read on and you will get my point in context.

7: This is a naive stance. We have no idea of the character of any punter who doesn't use the forums, and that is most of them.

8: If you're 'bored', read another review.

9: Stop trying to goad a reaction. It's childish and pointless.

I have made all my points.

[The Kerryman]

Extremely boring...

[The Kerryman]

And also boaring

[UKHeather]

did ever think of just going to a booking opened minded looking for fun??

and not have a check list?

mechanical escorts i think not mechincal clients i think yes,


can u not enjoy an encounter, do u need the nylons, leather strap on to come? can u not go hey i had lovely time with a nice girl?

why shud sex be dicated its natural no? why not let it continue to be natural moving form feeling and touch

not form number one on the list to number two



has the passion really been removed so much? u must enter with list almost demands? why not come in with a smile enjoy ur time

rather than fretting over trival shite


time and time again my most enjpyable clients are that not the ones who ask do u do this and do u that

i have sex, thats my answer i do a Natuiral think, and if i must do it under a check list, then fuck it i cudnt be bothered, im not mechincal

Precisely why I don't list 'services' - I'm not a bloody machine turning out the same product day in, day out.. If my reviews don't make it clear that I enjoy a good snog and a tumble then tough bananas.
I also request non-explicit reviews. Reading a detailed description of my own fanny would make me cringe. It's not necessary and it's demeaning.
Also, if a reviewer requests a booking, I check his reviews... If I don't like the way he writes them, I don't see him.

[Curvaceous Kate]

Reviewers are people and as such they are all different and have different character traits. Some are shy, some are well educated and have a way with words and others use more basic language. I could go on about how people react and respond differently to a situation, but I really don't need to. The point is that the booking happened behind closed doors, it is essentially a very private and intimate liason between two people and for many, this is how they would prefer to keep it and many do, as they don't write reviews. However, as a review system exists and it is beneficial to both parties for it to be used, many will write one despite being taken out of their comfort zone and discussing something that ordinarily they would prefer to keep to themselves, or they are aware that the lady does not accept explicit reviews (this does not need to be discussed, as we can opt out of them and I imagine it shows on the form).

So, the review is written, that points out all the elements that create the perfect atmosphere and the place was nice, the pictures were accurate, she is who she says she is and they would like to return, but they are not going into detail. Surely that tells you all you need to know? It certainly tells you a lot more than no review at all and even if the report is like a carbon copy of the ones written before, it shows that the lady is continuing to provide a good level of service and is consistent in what she offers.

Show me an industry/business that does not have it's own well used jargon? I imagine it is rather daunting writing a review for the first time and for those that do not consider themselves a poetic master of the pen, it is much easier to use a well known phrase, than to toil over how they skirt round discussing the more intimate areas of the booking, that they would rather not discuss. Wholly molly, I can just imagine how it must feel for someone who has just come out of sexual hibernation to then be faced with detailing it in a review, for what real reason? Will it really be of benefit to the next person to know that she finally managed to release his years of pent up tension with her hand/mouth/vibrator? Surely all you need to know is that he was well satisfied with the service and would like to go again?

Perhaps some of the phrases don't really hold much stock, they are stating the obvious, but it doesn't do any harm, so no damage done. I'm sure most readers skim through the reviews anyway, so it's not problematic or time consuming, plus I doubt anyone who has written an essay would likely add many chiched phrases, as they would be composing their own world of fantasy and delight to the imagination.

What am I saying? People write within their own comfort zone and that is how it should be. The fact they have taken the time to represent the Escort they have met and share their beliefs regarding the booking as a whole with respect and integrity is all that should matter. Who cares if they use a few cliches to help them through the experience?

[Lucy Chambers]

Explicit reviews. Yuck. Long winded essays. Yuck. It's a bit like trip advisor. You get reviews that would be more use if they were from the promo department of the hotel, and other reviews that are so terse you wonder if they were forced. Either way, much like long winded essays, most people don't read them all. Just check the greens and then the reviewers previous reviewed ladies.

[Mucker]

It's a pity that 'experiencedguy's' use of the word explicit has been latched onto and has now become the reference point for many since the two of us on this thread who have critcised cliché-ridden vaccuous reviews have not used the word 'explicit' at any stage. The point I have been making is that some reviews which use this 'I won't go into detail' stuff might as well not have been written at all for all they achieve.

You will get some who'll regard anything longer than a tabloid headline as a 'long-winded essay' but the real issue here is usefulness of reviews. They don't necessarily have to be long.

Here's an example of two random reviews which I consider to do the job well as in they genuinely recommend the escort and give a feel to the reader that they do so on performance rather than from some misguided illusion of a personal connection with the escort. One of them is longish, the other very brief. Neither of them is going on about 'fannies' or whatever. But neither are subsumed in a wave of cliché and waffle.

https://www.escort-ireland.com/escor...e-massage.html

https://www.escort-ireland.com/escor...le-escort.html

[Mucker]

Show me an industry/business that does not have it's own well used jargon?

With respect, 'I won't go into detail' and 'treat her with respect' are not jargon. They are mainstream phrases which have little significance in the context of reviews. The former is used as an excuse to say nothing, the latter as apparently some kind moral onanism for the writer.

Jargon is confined, by definition, to the language of a specific activity. So 'tea-bagging' etc. is jargon in the escorting/punting context.

I point this out just to make the point that the problem here is not jargon - you expect jargon in any area of activity which might not be transferable to other areas. The problem here is bland, meaning-neutral words and phrases.

[Curvaceous Kate]

With respect, 'I won't go into detail' and 'treat her with respect' are not jargon. They are mainstream phrases which have little significance in the context of reviews. The former is used as an excuse to say nothing, the latter as apparently some kind moral onanism for the writer.

Jargon is confined, by definition, to the language of a specific activity. So 'tea-bagging' etc. is jargon in the escorting/punting context.

I point this out just to make the point that the problem here is not jargon - you expect jargon in any area of activity which might not be transferable to other areas. The problem here is bland, meaning-neutral words and phrases.

Where that might be true, there are not many industries that are routinely reviewed. I'm sure if you look up the tourist industry you may find similar phrases used repitiously, as people tend to read previous reviews before writing their own to get a feel of expectation.

Jargon may have been the wrong turn of phrase, but I'm sure you understand what I was trying to convey.

[Mucker]

Where that might be true, there are not many industries that are routinely reviewed. I'm sure if you look up the tourist industry you may find similar phrases used repitiously, as people tend to read previous reviews before writing their own to get a feel of expectation.

Jargon may have been the wrong turn of phrase, but I'm sure you understand what I was trying to convey.

Yes, I understand your point. I suppose what I am saying is that such repetitious words/phrases are part of the cliché to which I object. We might indeed expect to see them in reviews for the reasons you cite but that doesn't necessarily make them helpful or illuminating.