Why aren't I surprised to see The Legend in their report.
Jamescork's Bernard Manning quote gave me a good oul chuckle.
Why aren't I surprised to see The Legend in their report.
Jamescork's Bernard Manning quote gave me a good oul chuckle.
Banger (12-09-12)
Milf Hunter on page 38 -Brings a whole different meaning to the phrase "Give your dog a bone"11. I would rather stick it in my neighbours dog.
There's plenty of respectful reviews that could be used to counter their arguments.
a thousand kisses deep..
Ok, My tuppence worth.
Managers here obviously have issues with NBT - not someone I know and can;t comment on. But this is the second time that they've tried to character assassinate the guy only for it to backfire spectacularly ...
On a more serious note, any of the reviewers quoted in that report must be feeling rather uncomfortable (and for some dumbass journo to include JR is just wrong). I hope that all are contacted by E-I and given the option of deleting reviews, etc, as was granted recently to a victim of media intrusion (as I suspect these guys will be contacted by media soon).
The last thread on whether 'Top Reviewers' should be so publicly accessble saw broad support for it's removal/modification. May I suggest that this is discussed further in the lounge? The lobby may be busy ...
Hd,
hd7055 (11-09-12)
Agreed JR, totally agreed - was going to suggest that E-I should seek a retraction on your behalf but really not sure you want more attention drawn? Know that you are held in very high regard here by anyone that has had dealings with you, and, personally, know you are a complete gentleman.
Have posted previously about having 'The Legend' as top reviewer and there was a thread on the whole issue of the 'Top Reviewers' list - can we as a community (including Management) discuss these issues further in the lounge? More and more people are getting uncomfortable with leaving public reviews ...
Hd.
JohnRambo (11-09-12)
Deleting any, or all, reviews at this point could backfire in a big way. Playing into their hands really.
Folks, I have just read their submission and the reviews they quote, while it is not a big thing but if anyone from this site is asked and agrees to appear before the committee it would be a good way to undermine thier submission to point out that they have used reviews that don't exist by JR. If you can undermine their submission so much the better.
For the record, I was followed after a punt, totally my fault. E-I were great when I explained my predicament. I have chosen not to review in light of this and because I feel more emphasis will come to bear on reviewers as this proposal progresses. I think it is shoddy to pick on NBT, JC, The Legend and others but everyone has an agenda, at least it appears that way to me. I sincerely hope that being quoted is the end of the matter, maybe E-I could look at their copyright clauses tho to protect members, just my view tho. Happy punting folks, and be safe and careful:-)
AbsoluteNoob (11-09-12), Clyde (11-09-12), Curvaceous Kate (11-09-12), hd7055 (11-09-12), Lucy Chambers (11-09-12), saoirsemac (11-09-12), the traveller (11-09-12)