Originally Posted by
waster69
Are some fake photo reports themselves fakes?
The fake photo report listed for Emily Eloa gives a URL. The implication is that the photos used on her website were copied from there.
However, I can see no photos of her on the website referred to. Maybe I would if I paid to subscribe to it - but I'm not falling for that trick!
I wonder if someone is abusing E-I's fake photo reports in order to promote their own website. This would be unfair to members as well as to advertisers. It's also possible that a false fake photo report might be posted by a punter with a grudge.
I haven't met Emily so I cannot comment on whether her photos ARE accurate - but I see no reason to trust this fake photo report.
Suggestions: E-I should not publish fake photo reports until they have checked them out. Maybe E-I could publish a notice to say that a fake photo report has been received but not the details until verified.