If you were an escort

[Anna23]

There is a difference between discussing services and advertising/offering your services. The latter can be done in the advertising sections or even for free in the non-advertising sections, once a week providing no contact details are included.

Exactly Sam, there is indeed a difference. We cannot discuss our work/services in the ad section since that was locked for discussions a long time ago thanks to girls moaning that some girls get more views on their threads than others. Now the situation is that some girls still do get more views than others but nobody can talk about anything escorting related anymore, anywhere.
Personally, I find it a bit curious but it is not my place to tell you how to conduct this website. Honestly I don't understand the perspective of the complainers who caused these rules to be brought into place but that probably means nothing else than that I am dumb. But trust me, I'm trying to understand it and thats why I begun this discussion, to gain more perspective.

[Lucy Chambers]

Exactly Sam, there is indeed a difference. We cannot discuss our work/services in the ad section since that was locked for discussions a long time ago thanks to girls moaning that some girls get more views on their threads than others. Now the situation is that some girls still do get more views than others but nobody can talk about anything escorting related anymore, anywhere.
Personally, I find it a bit curious but it is not my place to tell you how to conduct this website. Honestly I don't understand the perspective of the complainers who caused these rules to be brought into place but that probably means nothing else than that I am dumb. But trust me, I'm trying to understand it and thats why I begun this discussion, to gain more perspective.

Ah no, I see lots of escorts starting threads about why do clients do this and so on.

Maybe the thing is that the site want to encourage advertising escorts to post, but see no revenue in the non advertising ones and so move accordingly? As to be fair I cant see any escort having issues with your threads or others.

[Funny Bone]

I am actually one promotion away from being an escort

I just dont know who have to sleep with to get it!!

[doodlebug]

Ah no, I see lots of escorts starting threads about why do clients do this and so on.

Maybe the thing is that the site want to encourage advertising escorts to post, but see no revenue in the non advertising ones and so move accordingly? As to be fair I cant see any escort having issues with your threads or others.

Methinks you have a short memory grasshopper!!!!!

[Forrest]

There is a difference between discussing services and advertising/offering your services. The latter can be done in the advertising sections or even for free in the non-advertising sections, once a week providing no contact details are included.

Is there really a difference between the alleged self-promotion threads, and the non self-promotion threads?
Every post or thread by an escort is a potential 'self-promotion', but some seem to be more acceptable than others.

I have seen plenty of examples of 'self-promotion' threads by escorts that are allowed to stay up, but others aren't.
What is the criteria? A bit of consistency would be very useful too.

[Anna23]

Ah no, I see lots of escorts starting threads about why do clients do this and so on.

Maybe the thing is that the site want to encourage advertising escorts to post, but see no revenue in the non advertising ones and so move accordingly? As to be fair I cant see any escort having issues with your threads or others.

I'm relieved to hear that however I saw many escorts having an issue with other escorts for doing the exact same things I do (although these are paying hundreds of euros on advertising if that holds any water).
As I said earlier, as far as I know, Patricia doesn't have an issue with non paying advertisers posting here and I will repeat, that I for one really appreciate that and respect the way she conducts her business, so I don't understand your hypothetical reasoning there.
Also what do you mean by your first sentence?

[Lucy Chambers]

[/B]

I'm relieved to hear that however I saw many escorts having an issue with other escorts for doing the exact same things I do (although these are paying hundreds of euros on advertising if that holds any water).
As I said earlier, as far as I know, Patricia doesn't have an issue with non paying advertisers posting here and I will repeat, that I for one really appreciate that and respect the way she conducts her business, so I don't understand your hypothetical reasoning there.
Also what do you mean by your first sentence?

I mean that lots of escorts start threads about escorting matters, so that is allowed. I have no idea why your threads were not, I did not see them.

I doubt that Patricia reads the forum nowadays. So I guess what the Mods and managers have the issue with effects state of play nowadays. Anyhhoooo..


x

[Lucy Chambers]

Methinks you have a short memory grasshopper!!!!!

Ara, I take it you want to remind me of something. Don't bother, I couldn't give a monkey's chuff what is allowed and what is not. I have been warned for content once, many moons ago, took note and got on with it from there. Not my site, not my rules, and if girls want to complain then they pay to I guess.

[doodlebug]

Have to agree with Forrest it is the inconsistency that I find baffling!!!!

[Banjaxed]

I'm going to the cute animals thread. This is no good.