Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 25

Thread: Honesty folks ...

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    1,612
    Reviews
    54

    Default Honesty folks ...

    Folks

    Monster x 2 banned followed by Techno Vichking and Franken then this:

    https://www.escort-ireland.com/board...Photos-Reviews

    Posted this earlier in a separate thread ... see below.

    Pat & Co - if you keep allowing girls post stupid pics and not allow reviews strongly suspect business for them and you will dry up pretty quickly. Theirs in the short term but, really, how long do you think you can fool people?

    I want this place to succeed, don't get me wrong, but the aforementioned policy is for the kind of people I do not wish to associate with, and am surprised you wish to encompass.

    Hd.




    OK fake pic alert ...

    Why am I or others here, doing something that people employed by this site are being paid to do (but clearly aren't).

    Vanessa is ...

    http://javewung.zymichost.com/newdir...up/index3.html

    http://malaga.quebarato.com.es/serra...o__63C48E.html

    http://javewung.zymichost.com/newdir...up/index2.html

    Is the fake photo system beyond a joke given that girls who opt out of reviews now have automatically verified pics?

    Well beyond f**king ridiculous - will affect the 90+% that use the site but aren't registered. Great business planning E-I.

    Hd.

  2. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to hd7055 For This Useful Post:

    aml (14-04-12), BACMAN36 (14-04-12), black perl (14-04-12), blue8671 (14-04-12), Curvaceous Kate (14-04-12), Forrest (14-04-12), FullLife (14-04-12), harry10 (14-04-12), max california (15-04-12), saoirsemac (14-04-12), wolrac (14-04-12)

  3. #2
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    1,027
    Reviews
    11

    Default

    I absolutely agree.
    This new policy just makes it far easier for pimps and agencies to post multiple and fraudulent profiles.
    Well said HD

  4. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to FullLife For This Useful Post:

    black perl (14-04-12), Forrest (14-04-12), wolrac (14-04-12)

  5. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    14,758
    Blog Entries
    18

    Default

    Considering the high costs of advertising on EI I would like to think that the screening process was much better. It gives these ladies an unfair advantage and in times of recession and high expense with accomodation etc, it is likely another reason why less geniune ladies are touring Ireland.

  6. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Curvaceous Kate For This Useful Post:

    Forrest (14-04-12), FullLife (14-04-12), Uisce Beatha (14-04-12), wolrac (14-04-12)

  7. #4
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    1,027
    Reviews
    11

    Default

    Completely agree Kate.
    If screening standards slip any further, punters won't believe the profiles, and independents won't see the point in trying
    to compete with agencies, pimps etc. Slippery slope.
    Oh, and over 100 views of this thread but only a couple of replies?
    Are we all too busy wondering what kind of song we are today?

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to FullLife For This Useful Post:

    Forrest (14-04-12)

  9. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    10,051
    Blog Entries
    6
    Reviews
    21

    Default

    I agree, for the most part, with your comments HD, as it certainly will make it easier for some advertisers and
    as Kate said, give them an unfair advantage, but these changes shouldn't surprise any regular watchers of E-I.

    However, I also see some merit for proven independent ladies being allowed to still have their photos show
    as verified, if they subsequently opt out of the review system.

    Some of the other recent changes to E-I give me cause for concern, but that's for another thread, on another day.
    Last edited by Forrest; 14-04-12 at 09:59.

    Engaging Personality
    Mesmerising Eyes
    Magnificent Ass
    Adorable Lady
    Sexy, Wicked, Enticing, Erotic, Tease

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to Forrest For This Useful Post:

    El Gordo (14-04-12)

  11. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,473
    Blog Entries
    2
    Reviews
    36

    Default

    For those ladies with international experience and who advertise on many different sites, I would like to ask a simple question --- is it possible to introduce reasonable measures that will make a verification system near fully reliable ?

    As a client I would obviously like to have reviews available for all escorts,because that would suit me. However, I do understand that there is quite a bit of antagonism out there generally towards men 'scoring ' the preformance of the escort and furthermore I accept there may be many reasons why a genuine escort ( and jaysus, I am NOT asking why ! ) might not wish to be reviewed. Therefore I dont see that it is necessarily fair that a genuine escort ought to be forced to accept reviews in order to make up for a defective verification process.

  12. #7

    Default

    I have been broadcasting this for ages. There is a simply way of making this system work, if the escort has pictures of herself, fine but she must then produce a photograph that proves that she is the person in her portfolio. How? Simple! She buys a daily paper in the town/city that she is in. She gets a photograph of herself showing her face with the daily paper showing the headline of todays paper. She can use a phone to take the picture but it must show her face and the headline/date of the paper. Im not aware if some of you know but a picture sent will show the date when it was taken. This is found in photoshop.

  13. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    603
    Reviews
    62

    Default

    I have to agree with most of what has been said in this thread, I have watched quietly from the sidelines as the posters who were fantastic at picking up on fake profiles for the benifit of every client using EI were banned one by one.

    From a punters point of view it appears that as the escort advertisers pay to use the site and we punters do not it is in the company interest to have as many adverts as possible at any given time. Unfortunatly by exposing the fakes the likes of Monster Monster, Franken and Tecno seem to have been seen as costing EI there advertising income and therefore as a thorn in the side of EI.

    It really is a no win situation now for anyone trying to help other clients and I may also say the genuine escort advertisers who are perhaps even more effected by the fakes by exposing them as it appears a ban is the only thanks they appear to receive.

    However even I was suprised by the new rules as it leaves the door wide open to a far greater amount of fraudulant profiles, I am very disappointed that instead of taking a harder line EI appear to be more interested in there income as opposed to providing the best service possible.

  14. #9

    Default

    cash is king boys and girls

    think with your heads not ur cocks! it is YOU the punter that causing this as its profitable to do so!
    yes ei cud tidy it up but its a monopoly, for every indie on here they have 50 pimped girls and fake profiles to but up

    its already one of the most expensive websites to be on and for near 400e a month i expect not to have to compete with a playboy bunny for 50e,

    adult work is a pound a day!
    a years advertising on that is ei for 1.5 months... and there verification system works

    but tbh ive given up, and as soon as i can which may be in the comming months i will be leaving ireland in regards to work

    as with the garda and media down our necks and this crap tbh it wud break ur heart!

    its not fair but hey its how it rolls here, all the changes made it easier for agencys as ei just hid them better

    but credit where credit due, nicole and sam are amazing to the girls, and treat us with respect and care
    sure nicole like a best mate u have a natter and bitch with, dnt ever leave us muffin!

    and sam god bless u ya have to read some amount of stuff about fou fou's and not in the kinky sense, well unless ur that way inclined

    the work on ugly mugs is great, and give sam and nic a break when they get a little peeved with ye lot, read the shit they have to read everyday the attacks the rapes the media outting us and dealing with that

    the least of there worrys is a punter here wanting to change his name for example... i never blame them

    but the owners shud cop on a bit as when the law changes and change it will, ur going to need ur indies here,
    we will be ur income, just remember that
    ********************THE WHORIN AND TOURING NEWS************************
    no more news thats all folks, it was a pleasure

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to saoirsemac For This Useful Post:

    Curvaceous Kate (14-04-12)

  16. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,703
    Reviews
    6

    Default

    Not sure how EI verify photos but whatever the present system is, it ain't working.

    As some posters have said most punters are not aware of the forums and therefore would not be so clued into choosing their playmate. These are the guys that will get burned by these fake ladies/profiles.

    Ultimately the fake ladies will take over and the genuine independent ladies will be pushed out.
    Last edited by BACMAN36; 14-04-12 at 13:55.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •