Paul Connolly at it again!!!

[Banjaxed]

Oh, and less of the insulting comparison to muppets...Kermit may not have human rights as such, but I bet he can afford top notch lawyers...

Defence of (i) Truth, (ii) Honest opinion (iii) apology.

[dr love]

Always actually three side's doc lol , your side, my side, and the side that suits. Meaning the side we tell to the audience at hand, (can't be telling all the details to everyone now can we) xxx

I sence a little tension built up there doc, wink you should get that looks at xxx

Do you have a remedy then alisha .
Btw did you ever buy them .: doc

[dr love]

I sure do doc, you will need to come in person, to receive my remedy
Yes I bought them and your name is written all over

Yipeeee that's what I like to hear Alisha .
Now I'm off to check your tour dates .: doc xx

[Dave999]

Anyone want "Stephen's" facebook page? :P

[UKHeather]

Well i wouldnt say he will be seeing many from EI after his last few programs. I say send him to Shirley

All escorts should now have his photograph pinned on their doors so they can identify him and tell him to fuck off. I have laminated my copy and stuck it on the underside of the toilet seat

[LaBelleThatcher]

Ok, so far (quarter of the way through, my laptop is putting up one hell of a fight against running this):

1. A Hamburg madam who is a dead ringer for Sarah Benson.
2. The topless interview (with cunning editing of former Nurse that does not quite come off.)
3. Bemused middle aged German who seems saddened by Paul's inability to grasp that selling sex is "ok".
4. A jean clad male crotch shot.

Does anybody else pronounce it "purrostitute"?

If he was playing this for laughs, with a tiny tweak in the right direction, this might actually be good.

[LaBelleThatcher]

...I am also noticing a significant co-relation between the way people are filmed, and their attitude to sex work. Almost without exception, if they are respectfully asked for their consent and interviewed, they are in the sex industry by choice, but if they are stalked and filmed secretly, without their consent, they are, apparently, the helpless victims of traffickers.

I can also see (and anyone doing media studies might like to take note of this) that it seems to be far easier to pixelate a consenting male to unrecognisability than an unwitting female in the process of having her privacy invaded.

[saoirsemac]

that was on before, i found the interview with the 3 girls the funniest, there he is the boyo himself in all his glory
talking to 3 girlies tits out asking stupid question comming to conculsion, they are forced (when its clear they are not)


well paul my lad can u answer this



if they are indeed victims, why have u firstly expose them unblured and secondly and prob the most shocking if they are truly victims paul, did u feel it added to ur little sketch to have them topless?

or did u want a cheeky look before ur monthly wank into a sock, after which u run screaming to ur nearest church

going no mammy no, dnt cut my willy off i wnt touch it again and be a bold boy!



end of the day the line, paul connelly investigate cracks me up

more like paul connelly pushes his own bigot ideals and ruhuma agenda about the sex industry

in tonight show paul connelly will be speaking to random women in knee high boots, also paul speaks to the so called indies, and twists there words and come to his own conculsion that they must be forced,

paul also talks some topless victims, and some dirty perverted punters, paul also visted his mammy and his auntie sister josephine,

in visit we see paul breaking down under the pressure of investigating

''mammy *sniffles* why wnt they say they trafficked instead of *snobs* lieing to me, *sniffles*
sex is dirty mammy, it is *snobs*
''mammy'' i want some biba, the scence ends in a tender moment between mother and son breast feeding with the wee lad paul drifting into a blissful slumber



up next week breastfeeding when are they too old

[Sexy Sandy 69]

I watched the programme. There was the ex German head of police who told Paul that he thought there was nothing wrong with girls selling sex, he said that as far as he was concerned the girls were not trafficked, they offered a service & the guys knew where to go to get what they were looking for. Paul chose not to explore or elaborate on this conversation.

He also spoke to a woman who was working for a 'sexual abuse' foudation who said to Paul that what Ireland was proposing in criminalizing the purchase of sex would be negative, it would force the industry underground & make things worse for those that needed help. Again, Paul chose not to elaborate this line of questioning.

Why? I presume because both go against his beliefs & he doesn't want or intend to give an unbiased, truly informative documentary about the sex industry or the people who work in it. However, he did make an unfounded, transparant assumption that one of the girls he was talking to 'was far from happy & forced' into her chosen line of work. How does anyone come to that conclusion based on a 5 min interview?

Sandy of Newcastle x

[Jack in the Box]

When is Paul Connolly going to truly engage with all the people on our side who have a positive and correct message instead of displaying his usual biasness.

With a bit of luck he'll be stuck in Spain for a while because of the airport strikes after all his time wasting of sex workers and their supporters.