Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 60

Thread: Ratted Reviews- should they add to review count?

  1. #31

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JAMESCORK View Post
    Come 'ere Luce... We are not all feckin Eegits FFS... Any habitual punter will suss what all symbols mean fairly quickly… He would want to be a big fool to read a review with the heading “WARNING: We are suspicious of this review, it might be a FAKE. We Smell a Rat!” and think “Wow she sounds nice….” Pffff…

    Im with John on this one…
    No we aint are we James, my next punt is the one in the chair

    I thank you for your contribution
    Last edited by lucy chambers; 23-02-12 at 00:38.
    If life gives you lemons ask for Tequila

    Only sad bastards seek gratification from signatures

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    6,819

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JAMESCORK View Post
    Come 'ere Luce... We are not all feckin Eegits FFS... Any habitual punter will suss what all symbols mean fairly quickly… He would want to be a big fool to read a review with the heading “WARNING: We are suspicious of this review, it might be a FAKE. We Smell a Rat!” and think “Wow she sounds nice….” Pffff…

    Im with John on this one…
    I thought you were smarter than this James have you not learnt by now, don’t argue with Lucy even if you think she’s wrong? Just nod, smile and say yes that you agree with her for a quiet life, I know I do.
    "Live for nothing or die for something, your call."

  3. #33

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JohnRambo View Post
    I thought you were smarter than this James have you not learnt by now, don’t argue with Lucy even if you think she’s wrong? Just nod, smile and say yes that you agree with her for a quiet life, I know I do.
    Anyone can think I am wrong. Thats kind of why I put up a thread asking for other peoples opinion, as opposed to just getting mine

    As it is, I am waiting for the waggish comment we are just scared of the competition and the rat hunt is discrimination at its finest..when all I am actually doing is trying to make sure the decent chicks get rewarded and the dodgy ones dont get this promotion. Ho hum.
    If life gives you lemons ask for Tequila

    Only sad bastards seek gratification from signatures

  4. #34

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lucy chambers View Post
    Ok, so should we award half a rat? How do you mean?
    I think the whole review system is wrong. Personal taste of the punter may not be exactly what anyone else desires. How many times have you JC booked an escort and when she opens the door you have said "Oooh No" yet guided by reviews you thought you were on to a good thing. I might say wow and on that basis I leave a raving review. Set guidelines and / or questions should be answered then a section for personal remarks on posting a review. Although escorts have the opportunity to defend themselves that can be perseived as "she's a ratty old cow" but she may have felt intimidated by the punter for some reason.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    6,952

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by IamSimontemplar View Post
    "she's a ratty old cow"
    I agree, but let's leave me out of this

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    1,070

    Default

    I've had a rat on my reviews for a long time - I never met the bloke, and I have a receipt for the place I was in at the time of the 'meeting'

    The rat is still there.

    T
    x

  7. #37

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Taylor of Manchester View Post
    I've had a rat on my reviews for a long time - I never met the bloke, and I have a receipt for the place I was in at the time of the 'meeting'

    The rat is still there.

    T
    x
    Then the rat should be gone. Ladies who prove themselves reliable over time should be given the same consideration that seems to be being given to some of our newer escorts.
    If life gives you lemons ask for Tequila

    Only sad bastards seek gratification from signatures

  8. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Lucy Chambers For This Useful Post:

    EnglishAlex (23-02-12), stickytoffee10 (23-02-12)

  9. #38
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    1,066
    Reviews
    27

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lucy chambers View Post
    Then the rat should be gone. Ladies who prove themselves reliable over time should be given the same consideration that seems to be being given to some of our newer escorts.
    Yes if an escort can prove the booking didn't happen then I don't see no reason why the rat should still be there!

  10. #39
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    2,836

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JAMESCORK View Post
    Of course this does bring up the ol' can of worms... Escorts who are by all accounts great escorts, but who develop an unhealthy passion for a high review count, turn into chancers, and are rewarded with a few rats on their profile...

    Does this make tham a bad escort? ... Or just a chancer?
    It doesn't matter what it makes them, they are taking up spaces on the top reviewed list that belogs to far more deserving escorts. Ones who get on with their jobs and don't fuck everyone over to get to the top. Escorts who haven't lied about 15-20% of thier reviews.
    He felt her hands slide slowly up his thigh, he couldn't stop himself from growing hard. She caught his eye and in that second he knew: This erotic, sensual Lady is bold if she is anything. She would be upto mischief in no time...
    Some things never change

  11. #40
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    1,066
    Reviews
    27

    Default

    Some of me best bookings have been with ladies which haven't lots of reviews nobody likes cheats! Like I said some ladies do have an unhealthy obsession with the reviews.

Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •