More questionable Profile Pics...

[Franken996]

Despite this profile being verified & even having 15 Reviews, there's something ahem interesting about those photos...

Have a look at what happens when the first is run thru Google images... & something familiar also happens with second pic too...
Tbf, this lady is clearly 'real' but the photos seem to be a different story...

In light of the court case reported last week, perhaps EI should be a lil more diligent

https://www.escort-ireland.com/21590...sh-escort.html

[Franken996]

First pic on this profile is all over the net!! -
Appears it's originally from German Playboy site: http://www.tineye.com/search/bb92cc8db178521c981d6472e8abd70b8813a38d/

..& yeah I've reported it!

[fiatpunter]

In light of the court case reported last week, perhaps EI should be a lil more diligent

That's mad..... They only discovered Prosecco in the US last year??

[Franken996]

That's mad..... They only discovered Prosecco in the US last year??

LOL- maybe..but they discovered Prosecution along time before that

[Franken996]

Looks to me like she slipped in a plausible playboy photo along with her real pics. A bit naughty perhaps, but hardly the crime of the century now.

Hmmm- ya think...but check 2nd link from OP.......

[Franken996]

Doesn't return any results for me, I think the offending photo has been removed from her profile. Actually it looks to me like the shot from behind was PB also, but I don't get any hits on that one either.

Funny that... don't know how often you run Tineye/GI on EI pics...
but the following looks mighty familiar to me-

[DaithiMac]

Well spotted Franken996!! Its true when u start looking its easy to see many fake pics. It shouldnt be allowed. Very unfair on the honest escorts.
David

[Gary]

Hi-

As the Photo report was raised using a tin-eye link, which we do not usually accept as they can be unreliable, I have changed the source of the image on the report report.

As there is a thumbnail of the same image on a playboy site (who would not post images they do not own) I also agree that the advertiser has probably tried to "slip" one picture in. It has now been removed and, in line with the rules, the report has been activated.

Thanks for the report, appreciated. In the future please raise the report on the source link and not the tin-eye

[Franken996]

Hi-

As the Photo report was raised using a tin-eye link, which we do not usually accept as they can be unreliable, I have changed the source of the image on the report report.

As there is a thumbnail of the same image on a playboy site (who would not post images they do not own) I also agree that the advertiser has probably tried to "slip" one picture in. It has now been removed and, in line with the rules, the report has been activated.

Thanks for the report, appreciated. In the future please raise the report on the source link and not the tin-eye

Gary- you're very welcome! Appreciate you guys are no doubt snowed under with all these shenanigans so fair play!

While I take your point that Tineye/GI don't always provide 100% immediate 'evidence' of B&S pics..that's akin to saying that as seat-belts don't always save you in a car crash, why bother!?
Tineye/GI are merely starting points - and as you observe yourself - in this specific case led (within two clicks) to the German Playboy site- food for thought!
cheers

[Franken996]

I don't think those are hits, because basically every image on the site will trigger the same result. I think Google Images is either picking up on the Escort-Ireland logo or the format of the picture file name. When Google Image search returns picture hits, I check those.

Very fair & plausible observation- it's just that when you go digging further <when you get that rather common hit> for some reason the pics often come back as dodgy..but I take your point!