what's up with the review censorship?

[EnglishAlex]

OK, I don't mean to flatter anybody here but so far I see very little or nothing wrong with bumbum's reviews.

The part about A is followed by a smiley face, I personally did take it as a joke. The escort, if she doesn't do A will be in fact happy to have such detail on her reviews, as a double confirmation she doesn't offfer the service.

Maybe the part that was censored was bad, I wouldn't know what was there before, so I cannot comment on it, but excepting this, it's looks OKish to me.

There are some really nasty reviews out there, I won't give examples now, but bumbum's one are far from that level.

I like to read between the lines and my instincts tell me he's pushy. I dislike how he reviews too.

You're right, there are some nasty reviews and I'd try and steer clear of the people who wrote those too.

Thank heavens for review mods!

[bumbumbumbum]

Yes, when I pay 200/hr for anything, I endeavor to make my personal wishes well understood, in the hope of getting my money's worth. So yes, I am pushy, I know what I like, and I do hope to get it at that hourly rate. I've noticed that a lot of ads cater to my tastes, so I don't think it's just me. I suspect I'm not alone in generally wanted to know the actual situation, before I commit my semi-precious time to a jaunt.

I don't really see anything wrong with that. I also assert my wishes when I hire a plumber, or a solicitor, or a doctor. And yes I might comment on the plumber exposing the base of his spine (sugar coated), or a solicitor with a halitosis issue (sugar coated), or a doctor who has forgotten his or her training around the concept of frequent hand washing. And I would sure like to know in advance about these shortcomings, and I suspect said provider might benefit from knowing as well.

It's called "being a pro." Pros should be able to take it, and of course they are generally free to decline to offer me their services. I'm open about what I want or do not want. And happy to share. So it feels weird to be censored on such a forum for factual statements.

[EnglishAlex]

Yes, when I pay 200/hr for anything, I endeavor to make my personal wishes well understood, in the hope of getting my money's worth. So yes, I am pushy, I know what I like, and I do hope to get it at that hourly rate. I've noticed that a lot of ads cater to my tastes, so I don't think it's just me. I suspect I'm not alone in generally wanted to know the actual situation, before I commit my semi-precious time to a jaunt.

I don't really see anything wrong with that. I also assert my wishes when I hire a plumber, or a solicitor, or a doctor. And yes I might comment on the plumber exposing the base of his spine (sugar coated), or a solicitor with a halitosis issue (sugar coated), or a doctor who has forgotten his or her training around the concept of frequent hand washing. And I would sure like to know in advance about these shortcomings, and I suspect said provider might benefit from knowing as well.

It's called "being a pro." Pros should be able to take it, and of course they are generally free to decline to offer me their services. I'm open about what I want or do not want. And happy to share. So it feels weird to be censored on such a forum for factual statements.

You didn't respect the fact that A was not offered when you tried to persuade her to do it.

Factual statements do not have to be vulgar. I'm obviously not the only person who agrees as your review was Moderated.

There's nothing wrong with asserting your wishes as you say but I find it's always easier if you have a specific service in mind, to go with someone who offers that rather than put a lady in an awkward position. Pun intended.

You're so convinced there's nothing wrong with how you reviewed, I don't see the point in wasting my time replying to you further.

[Lincoln]

Yes, when I pay 200/hr for anything, I endeavor to make my personal wishes well understood, in the hope of getting my money's worth. So yes, I am pushy, I know what I like, and I do hope to get it at that hourly rate. I've noticed that a lot of ads cater to my tastes, so I don't think it's just me. I suspect I'm not alone in generally wanted to know the actual situation, before I commit my semi-precious time to a jaunt.

I don't really see anything wrong with that. I also assert my wishes when I hire a plumber, or a solicitor, or a doctor. And yes I might comment on the plumber exposing the base of his spine (sugar coated), or a solicitor with a halitosis issue (sugar coated), or a doctor who has forgotten his or her training around the concept of frequent hand washing. And I would sure like to know in advance about these shortcomings, and I suspect said provider might benefit from knowing as well.

It's called "being a pro." Pros should be able to take it, and of course they are generally free to decline to offer me their services. I'm open about what I want or do not want. And happy to share. So it feels weird to be censored on such a forum for factual statements.

Oh thats ok then. I didnt realise you are completely right. I thought someone (mods), charged to exercise some consideration on behalf of girls who meet complete strangers in a manifestly vulnerable situation, were quite justified in making these judgement calls.

But really all along it was a case of the stiffling and censorship of your thoughts and a crude checking of the free play of your will.

Folks this is a landmark. An epoch if you will. Let freedom ring with a volley of truth and candour from this free-thinking and horizon expanding visionary.

etc. etc. etc. yawn....

[bumbumbumbum]

You didn't respect the fact that A was not offered when you tried to persuade her to do it.

Factual statements do not have to be vulgar. I'm obviously not the only person who agrees as your review was Moderated.

There's nothing wrong with asserting your wishes as you say but I find it's always easier if you have a specific service in mind, to go with someone who offers that rather than put a lady in an awkward position. Pun intended.

You're so convinced there's nothing wrong with how you reviewed, I don't see the point in wasting my time replying to you further.

The ads do say that not everything on offer is mentioned in the ad, so I hardly think it's a huge mortal sin to ask for something even if it's not explicitly on offer. Given the number of times it's been on offer (but then, oops, not really), as well as not on offer (but, oops, maybe for you, because it turns out my physical persona is nicer than this), one can understand my confusion. But I guess in THIS community, it's not acceptable to mention that part of the intercourse in a review, at least, in your opinion (that part wasn't censored, but seems to have struck a cord with you).

What I can accept is that as a matter of style, that kind of review is generally frowned upon by this community. I would have preferred to receive that as offline feedback, and to be pointed to some specific guidelines, rather than be censored, but whatever. I certainly have no experience in keeping this community pumping, and I'm sure it's full of every flavor of eccentric (sugar coated), so who am I to criticize what it takes to keep it ticking along. I have in fact lurked for a number of years, read hundreds of reviews, and when I finally got around to trying to contribute something, oops, I contributed reviews in the style I would prefer to read them.

Either way, censorship sucks.

[n73]

Oh God, here we go. Who has the popcorn ? Wait till Lucy and Saoirse get ya, ya big plank ya !!

[gentelmandave]

I poked around a bit for guidelines, but none jumped out at me. Didn't exactly exhaustively search for them.

But I'm a bit confused ... in my reviews if I include some information that isn't completely glowingly positive, just generally possibly useful, like that's there's some spitting involved instead of lube, or that someone's breasts have not necessarily been treated well by gravity, it gets censored as "offensive" or "inappropriate". Give me a break! This stuff is true and useful. If spitting really grossed me out, I'd want to know about it from a review, but here it gets censored.

Plus censorship is generally lame. Who knows? Maybe this whole post gets censored. Maybe I even get banned. :-|

Why dont you POKE About for some Manner's you Troll??? Sure you have probably being already being banned before? So why not again! Id hang ya high if i could

[UKHeather]

But what do I know.

Not much, apparantly.

[gentelmandave]

Oh God, here we go. Who has the popcorn ? Wait till Lucy and Saoirse get ya, ya big plank ya !!

I will step in for the two lovely ladies till the arrive n73 He is not just a Plank? But a Complete Wank and probably a banned user

[UKHeather]

Yes, when I pay 200/hr for anything, I endeavor to make my personal wishes well understood, in the hope of getting my money's worth. So yes, I am pushy, I know what I like, and I do hope to get it at that hourly rate. I've noticed that a lot of ads cater to my tastes, so I don't think it's just me. I suspect I'm not alone in generally wanted to know the actual situation, before I commit my semi-precious time to a jaunt.

I don't really see anything wrong with that. I also assert my wishes when I hire a plumber, or a solicitor, or a doctor. And yes I might comment on the plumber exposing the base of his spine (sugar coated), or a solicitor with a halitosis issue (sugar coated), or a doctor who has forgotten his or her training around the concept of frequent hand washing. And I would sure like to know in advance about these shortcomings, and I suspect said provider might benefit from knowing as well.

It's called "being a pro." Pros should be able to take it, and of course they are generally free to decline to offer me their services. I'm open about what I want or do not want. And happy to share. So it feels weird to be censored on such a forum for factual statements.

I like my time with clients to be fun, pleasurable etc
If you don't mind my saying so... An hour with you doesn't sound like it would be much fun