Page 27 of 51 FirstFirst ... 17252627282937 ... LastLast
Results 261 to 270 of 508

Thread: Welcome RTE Viewers

  1. #261
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    31,568

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dave1dave View Post
    So in essence you are saying he wasn't in breach of any rule. And banned for not 'Doing what he was told' ? So to take this a step further if you decide no one is to further discuss Agencies then to do so would be a bannable action ??

    If this were to continue then the forum would end up with a list of allowed topics and to diverge from these topics would be forbidden. Smacks of George Orwells 1984.


    Just saw rule 43.75, that explains it so
    Pretty much, yes.

  2. #262
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    31,568

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by UKHeather View Post
    What other sites are there????? Sites that are not owned by the same management of this one, that is?Also, come on Sam, we all know who E-designers belongs to. Wasn't someone closely related to them imprisoned not too long ago for brothel keeping? that itself tells me that EI knows exactly what's going on and who they are aiding when they advertise these girls.
    Those people were shown on the programme last night. I do not agree with that. I think invasion of privacy, in such a way, is disgusting and inexcusable. 'Pat' has my total sympathy in that regard. But your making remarks based on one word, "like" to draw attention away from this site is just silly, petty and treating folk like idiots. I think this time, pulling up the drawbridges is not going to work. There are things that need addressing and questions that need answers. I don't give a shit who owns the site. I do give a shit about girls who are being controlled and how pimps are affecting genuine independent escorts. I also give a shit that they are being advertised here. It's not good enough. The site has to start and be seen to take some responsibility.
    With hindsight, yeah... probably a pretty weak argument on my part there!
    Last edited by samlad; 08-02-12 at 15:13.

  3. #263
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    10,051
    Blog Entries
    6
    Reviews
    21

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by samlad View Post
    This is rule 43¾ for anyone who missed it when agreeing to the T's and C's:
    This is the basis on which you have banned MM

    The owners of Escort Ireland Community reserve the right to remove, edit, move or close any content item for any reason.

    As far as I'm aware, he did not post anything, he just pm'd links to certain news articles to interested parties.
    I read them, will I be banned for doing so, now that I have been brain washed by MM's propoganda?

    Engaging Personality
    Mesmerising Eyes
    Magnificent Ass
    Adorable Lady
    Sexy, Wicked, Enticing, Erotic, Tease

  4. #264
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    31,568

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Forrest View Post
    This is the basis on which you have banned MM

    The owners of Escort Ireland Community reserve the right to remove, edit, move or close any content item for any reason.

    As far as I'm aware, he did not post anything, he just pm'd links to certain news articles to interested parties.
    I read them, will I be banned for doing so, now that I have been brain washed by MM's propoganda?
    In a word, no.

  5. #265
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    31,568

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dave1dave View Post
    I think you can apply that to a few other situations too.


    Forrests been infected... Better ban him
    I'm sure I probably could. 15,500 posts.... I can't be right all the time now

  6. #266
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    31,568

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dave1dave View Post
    Worthy of a thread of its own

    Anyway we digress, why can E-I not spot these large agencies when RTE can over a period of four months ? So much so they can even show invoices paid to E-I.
    Well, it's highly organised crime Dave. We aren't in Ireland following them about, but it is definately food for thought and hopefully something we can tighten up on.

  7. #267
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    10,051
    Blog Entries
    6
    Reviews
    21

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by samlad View Post
    In a word, no.
    In a word, Yes.

    It's quite clear he didn't break any rules, just continued to enlighten members about information
    that was already in the public domain(but I hadn't seen it before).

    You then posted the T&C's of your lord & master, and highlighted this.

    The owners of Escort Ireland Community reserve the right to remove, edit, move or close any content item for any reason

    It's the kop out response when anyone tries to make a difference, and E-I doesn't like it.

    Engaging Personality
    Mesmerising Eyes
    Magnificent Ass
    Adorable Lady
    Sexy, Wicked, Enticing, Erotic, Tease

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Forrest For This Useful Post:

    Anna23 (08-02-12)

  9. #268

    Default

    I am fairly certain E-I can recognize if multiple ladies use the same bank account info and could in the future disallow such practices. They could also revise how financial transactions are carried out that would further tighten controls to prevent trafficking.

    But they probably won't.

  10. #269
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    94
    Blog Entries
    7
    Reviews
    31

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by UKHeather View Post
    That seems be an idealised vision. Groups like Ruhama will still be needed because there will still be ladies who are forced into the work, (either by desperation or by other people), and will be looking for help, support and/or a way out.
    Do you really think society would change its views on the industry? I don't. We are a long way from being relieved of the image of diseased crack whores.
    I do agree that regulation and sex worker registration is the way forward though.
    I agree about registration. I was taken by how little Ruhama talked about the welfare of women and the support that could and should be given to them - suggests they are more interested in moralising than welfare. Maybe I am wrong and some people have experience of genuine support and help for themselves or people they know from the Ruhama organisation.
    Of all the ladies spoken to by RTE on the programme they only showed an offer of support to one lady and did not talk about offering support to any others ( apart from the unfortunate victim of trafficking from Africa). Is this all they did? or did they offer support to others and get reactions on film that were not in line with the argument they were broadcasting?

  11. #270

    Default

    I called the Agency xxx maybe about 6weeks ago for an outcall, i really wanted to see one of there girls. Anyway im super happy i didnt go through with it now.

Page 27 of 51 FirstFirst ... 17252627282937 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •