Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 34 of 34

Thread: what defines a good review to a bad review

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    6,753
    Reviews
    31

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by samlad View Post
    I never understood why people make an issue of someone else's reviews anyway? I can understand if it was malicious or too personal, but never when it's a balanced and informative review? Generally, why do people get so passionate about it? I'm not a punter so I can't really relate to it.

    Another thing, a lot of the time, the escorts that actually bear the brunt of a bad review tends to just get on with it, although we do also get a lot of complaints about fake reviews. Why do clients get so wound up by it?
    Ha! Ha! Sam! I'm sure you ask yourself that question many times a day about various topics raised on this forum - all giving you a headache!

    However, I can see where this is coming from. Reviews are a really important part of this industry, for clients and escorts alike. Although I know some would disagree.

    I think part of the issue is consistency in what constitutes a green star versus a grey or red star?

    However, I think that flawed as the system is , I do think it maintains a good balance at the moment.

    The star/button comes down to one question in the tick box section: How happy were you with the experience overall? - Very happy, Fairly happy, Neither happy nor unhappy, Fairly unhappy, Very unhappy.

    The first two options give a green plus button, the middle option gives a grey button, and the last two generate a red button.

    I think it is a fair question and the appropriate one to determine the rating of the appointment. Of course the problem is each client may have a different definition of what makes the overall experience Very happy, Fairly happy, Neither happy nor unhappy, Fairly unhappy, Very unhappy.

    I don't think there is solutiuon to this. If it becomes too prescriptive then the review system loses it's value. I presume the review mods have some leeway in changing the overall rating if it doesn't tally at all with what is written. Also we have this section of the forum to discuss reviews that we disagree with.

    It has been said that often a review says more about the reviewer than the lady being reviewed! But this in itself is very useful. When looking at the reviews of a lady I am planning to see I would often check out the negative reviews, and then check out the reviews by that said reviewer. I quickly get an impression of whether the said reviewer is reasonable or not, and then make up my own mind based on the lady's other reviews.
    "Don't be reckless with other people’s hearts. Don't put up with people who are reckless with yours"

  2. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Morpheus For This Useful Post:

    blue8671 (30-01-12), itstimenow (29-01-12), mellors (29-01-12), mer (29-01-12), westcorklad (29-01-12)

  3. #32
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    7,659
    Reviews
    7

    Default

    i dont really know i just read the review now, i think the 2 people are at fault here, i dont think the escort in name should confirmid that booking if she new there was no shower gel, like come on shower gel wud cost about 1 or 2 euro thats the cheapeast brand lol

    and i think the said reviwer shud of knowing by the start if there was no shower gel there!! and as for the no french kissing thing well maybe he had smelly breath and as he said in the review there was no toiltries so how cud he use mouthwash??

    so the 2 are at fault here but i think the said lady is more at fault you dont advertise any of them favourites eg. fk if there is no mouth wash in the appartment, she should of not accepted his booking at all!! and the said reviwer shud of left cause like no shower gel or mouthwash= your defo not touching my face lol he shud of politly refused and she shud of not taking the booking!!

    but hey you live and learn dont ya

    he shud of left and left an n/a review , but hey i cant be everyones mammy to hold there hand lol we make decisions in life, whether its the right 1 or not

    but i still think she shud not of confirmed that booking without any toiltries

    im guessing there was no mouthwash offered cause he wasnt even offered a shower!!
    Last edited by mer; 29-01-12 at 21:28.

  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mer For This Useful Post:

    itstimenow (29-01-12), Rodney69 (29-01-12)

  5. #33
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    6,753
    Reviews
    31

    Default

    "Part Deux"

    These are things for which I would give a negative rating. (Note: I haven't given a negative review yet)

    1) The lady treats me like shit (please don't ask me to define that. I just know when I've been treated like shit)

    2) The photos are fake are extremely outdated (not talking about a different haircut, a few extra pounds, a few years over, or a bit photoshopped)

    3) False advertising of services???? I 've actually dropped this from the reasons for giving a negative review although it is extremely frustrating for the client. The reason I've dropped it is that the new favourites allow a girl to advertise both providing and not providing a service - e.g oral with condom and OWO? We all had a part in this as it was put to the vote (by Nicole's poll), so only have ourselves to blame. I also believe it is the lady's right to choose not provide an advertised favourite at any given time - even though it is soooo frustrating for the said client.

    Of course if a lady does advertise and important favourite but doesn't provide it to any client not just me, that might be grounds for disatisfaction. But once a lady states she doesn't want explicit reviews, then the tick box for services disappears, so I don't really know what others have received.

    So, all in all I think personally I wouldn't use this factor to determine a negative review, even though it can be very disappointing. I would however mention it in the written part of my review - what advertised services were ommited.

    4) Changes if advertised fees. I'm not talking about extras for a few of the more risque favourites, but where you're told a different price at the door, from that advrtised on E-I.


    I have had the odd liason that has been underwhelming but don't feel it justified a negative or grey rating. I think the absence of the click factor isn't a reason for a negative review. Overall if the lady doesn't blatantly falsely advertise and does put in the effort for service provision, I will be ticking the green button (although it may be fairly happy). I tend to elaborate more in my written review, or in my case - omit praise (as some other clients/posters have picked up).

    Then again, as stated in my earlier post, there must be the freedom for the reviewer to decided this. So in relation to the review highlighted - that is his prerogative.
    Last edited by Morpheus; 29-01-12 at 21:48.
    "Don't be reckless with other people’s hearts. Don't put up with people who are reckless with yours"

  6. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Morpheus For This Useful Post:

    itstimenow (29-01-12), max california (29-01-12), mellors (29-01-12), mer (29-01-12), Rodney69 (29-01-12)

  7. #34

    Default

    Totally agree every one should be clean. Have had 2 appointments where no shower was offered. Put me off straight away

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •