Is it just me or are the recent reviews of Anna Savicha written by somebody with an obvious agenda?
My view on those reviews was that things were a lot more personal and someone was consciously out to harm the girls business.
I see where Patricia has edited those “reviews” but ffs when it is that obvious that someone is out to cause harm they should never have been put up in the first place so perhaps a better move would be to remove them altogether if she feels something is not right.
I’ve not met the girl personally and have no vested interest here but her history here and elsewhere is more or less unanimously positive, surely the Mods should recognise certain patterns in long standing escorts reviews and be able to recognise when something is not right.
Granted a good service provider will also have her off days and should not be immune from negative comment in a review when it is deserved.
Putting aside the fact that Anna is opinionated and fiery, which is no bad thing really in the grand scheme of things, she appears to be 100% genuine in so far as what you see is what you get.
Freedom of speech is one thing but when people start abusing that and are left write what they like regardless of the harm caused then perhaps more stringent monitoring of the boards, particularly the reviews may be called for.
I’m not looking to debate the pros and cons of the review system or the right of people to post as they wish or even debate the merits or otherwise of Anna herself but when that right to post freely is being abused then the Mods should step in and delete them entirely because presently people are writing whatever they want with little or no thought to the actual consequences… or perhaps a good deal of thought was put into the consequences?