You may well be right there. Whilst some escorts are genuinely only declining reviews because they don't want sexually explicit reviews of themselves, others are probably doing so purely because they provide a shite service and they know it! I don't deny this, in fact I would hope the proposed changes currently being discussed would help this issue greatly, as they will make it clearer who is declining reviews for genuine reasons and who is simply decling reviews for no reason other than that they are not providing a decent service.
You are dead right Paws. I'd tell you to bugger off if you complained to me that you were offended by a sexually explicit message board advert!
There is an important difference between sexually explicit and sexually explict and about you personally though. For example it would be one thing me telling you "I like sticking a rampant rabbit up my arsehole" but it would be another thing if I started talking about sticking that rabbit up your arsehole
And more importantly than that, the issue for escorts who don't want sexually explicit reviews is not simply that they find it offensive in many cases - It is that for legal or personal friends and family reasons they do not want it published online for all to see that they are having sex with clients.
IIE is a clearly illegal website. That means they can do stuff that a legally compliant website like E-I can't, like allow ladies to advertise sexual services for money (e.g. Anal Sex, 50 euro extra etc) and publish reviews of escorts regardless of whether or not they consent to being reviewed on that site.
As I've said many times before, I believe keeping within the law is the way forward and I also have no personal desire to live like a criminal on the run from the police, the taxman, civil suits etc like IIE do, so E-I is staying legal and that is just that my boy!
Pat x