I'll keep this very simple people...
If you can't afford to see an escort, don't.
I'll keep this very simple people...
If you can't afford to see an escort, don't.
Amy Alison (13-12-11), kitty escort (13-12-11), carlos marvado (13-12-11), emmasweet (14-12-11), harry10 (13-12-11), hd7055 (13-12-11), ladiesman217 (13-12-11), Lucy Chambers (13-12-11), max california (13-12-11), medicine man (13-12-11), mer (13-12-11), monster_monster (13-12-11), Nicole (13-12-11), Rodney69 (13-12-11), Sexy Samantha British (13-12-11), sara26 (14-12-11), English Nina (13-12-11), Sexy Sandy 69 (13-12-11), Stella (13-12-11), sweet rebeka (13-12-11), thehighwayman (13-12-11), theqm (13-12-11), veronique (13-12-11), wakka (13-12-11)
ohhh wait i can do that....
samlad (13-12-11)
Sums it up nicely and simply.
Pity what’s nice and simple seems to be so difficult to grasp by some people
English Nina (13-12-11), Sexy Sandy 69 (13-12-11)
Indeed..keeping with the cartoon theme:
Joking aside- would it be prudent to simply point out that <Price> threads aint allowed?
Last edited by Franken996; 13-12-11 at 20:24.
Nicole (13-12-11)
hd7055 (13-12-11)
I agree 100% with Sam's sentiments.......if you can't afford to see an escort, then don't......it is somewhat of a luxury and probably a rather expensive outlay for some people's pockets. Everybody in agreement thus far?..........Good!
However, somebody coming on here starting a debate about escort rates, or contributing to such a debate, from whichever angle they may be coming from i.e. escort or client, is not exactly against any site rules, is it? It may not be the most valid of comparisons, but in reality, it is not a world removed from the old dears discussing food prices in the supermarket, or people complaining how hard it is to get hold of a good tradesman when you need one and how much they charge when you finally get one. The principle remains the same.
Now I can understand escorts not being greatly enamoured by this topic being debated here, just as maybe many clients are not too comfortable with a lot of their brothers being portrayed as dirty-arsed, or rude etc. But it's a valid topic for debate, especially on a site of this nature, and I can't ever recall clients complaining about such threads or queueing up to report them to the Patcave.
So at last, I get around to my question. Are some topics simply not up for debate? Do some people (non E-I staff) get to exercise a veto over what is acceptable in a thread? Why was the thread in question locked? It concerns me, as a had a somewhat funny post prepared and ready to send, but found that I had wasted 10 minutes of my life typing it as the thread had been locked.
Sorry, that was three questions......my bad!
Conrad de Montferrat (14-12-11), Franken996 (13-12-11)