Page 4 of 12 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 114

Thread: Escort Reviews - An Update

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    8,638
    Blog Entries
    11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mailman View Post
    Why thank you, i do try




    Ok, i see your point but ..... theres always a but

    The story with the current situation with favourites ticked? They are not extras, just favourites and the punter finds out for himself when he gets there? That's fair enough

    In the new reviews, there should be something to suggest if favourites are accurate or not. In the old 'real' reviews they can be ticked and you know if its there, extra or not. In the new 'not so real' reviews that would need to be there too, i.e. favourites accurate or favourites not accurate. A yes/no type affair.

    This and overpricing have to be addressed in the 'not so real' reviews.

    Also, will there be a way of filtering out these new reviews as well (i already dont think it will benefit punters) and you'll have girls with 'real' reviews opting for the 'not so real' reviews, making a fairly non-intuitive system (fake reviews and inaccurate review common place) even less so now.

    I have given up on report fake reviews (one girl trying to discredit another girl, or a girl writing her own) for the simple reason, i got more information for them doing a bad job of it than the actual review system itself.

    I'll be honest, i only read reviews for the information. I seriously think that info will not be evident in the new system, thus making it redundant.



    And just on reviews themselves, anyone can read mine and see what you think. I do not abuse this, i comment mostly on the girls character, language barrier, attitude, etc. and avoid any crudeness or unpleasant language that the girl may not enjoy.

    Maybe something that should be added for the girls benefit is a 'reply button' within the 'real' reviews where she can comment and ask for it to be addressed. Having the button there may encourage more use of this system. Just a suggestion.

    A lot of very good food for thought there, thank you. I am sure we will take on some of these suggestions, so you can soon tell people you are an architect of the E-I reviews system

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    8,638
    Blog Entries
    11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bigpaws View Post
    Although I do accept that there may be a few good escorts who don't currently allow reviews because they object to sexually descriptive reviews of the services they provide everybody here knows, including you Patricia, that most of the escorts who don't at present allow reviews do so because they provide a terrible service and this new system will allow them to post fake reviews which will be impossible to detect ................ this is a very very bad idea and I for one will never visit an escort who will only allow "partial" reviews just as I won't visit an escort who doesn't allow reviews at all.
    It's the text part of the review which allows us to spot the fake reviews presently, take that away and it will be impossible to know which reviews are genuine and which are fake .......... you really should completely scrap this idea in my opinion Pat.

    Paws
    I am reading all this feedback and taking it very seriously, but this idea is not going to be scrapped... We have to do something to get escorts not accepting reviews currently back into the reviews system in some shape. It cannot be a good thing that clients cannot review in any way a number of escorts listed here currently. Maybe we should stop calling the other option "partial reviews" or similar, maybe it shouldn't be part of the reviews system as such, but I think there has to be a way for clients to rate escorts not accepting reviews for things like accuracy of photos, level of service etc. If at the same time as we made these changes, we also upgraded the system so you could see detailed info about the reviewers, e.g. number of message board posts they had made, that would help too.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    8,638
    Blog Entries
    11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Little Willy View Post
    PISSED OF .jUST AFTER SPENDINGTHE LAST 10 MINUTES REPLYING TO ABOVE TOPIC. WHEN i PRESSED THE QUICK REPLY BUTTON I WAS REDIRECTED TO THE LOG IN PAGE . i HAD ALLREADY LOGGED IN .tHIS HAS HAPPENED BEFORE ON NUMERIOUS OCCASSIONS AND HAS STOPPEP ME FROM REPLYING.
    WHY DOES THIS HAPPEN.
    ANNOYED LITTLE WILLY
    Like DumM37 said, look to your browser settings, check the "remember me" option when logging in etc, and your problems should be solved.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    8,638
    Blog Entries
    11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Packo View Post
    Hey Patricia, for what its worth here's my input.
    I think the review page should include a photo. there should also be some sort of a rating system be it stars or numbers for this reason. you are looking for an escort and want to find the best girl in say Dublin who provides the service you require. if there was a rating system you could visit this site and lok at the ratings page, and pick out a girl to visit very quickly. the rating system could be based on number of reviews added to a selection of dropdown menus in the review itself and the ratings could be broke down into countys to make it easier and quicker to select an escort. Also I think there should be an escort of the month for the escort who has the most and best reviews in each county...

    just an idea

    Packo
    Good ideas there, thank you.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    8,638
    Blog Entries
    11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Packo View Post
    If at all possible can you put an "availability Today" section in that the escorts can log into and update on a daily basis something like this

    not available
    morning appts available
    afternoon appts available
    evening appts available
    after 9pm appts available

    Save a lot of timewasting for clients and escorts

    Packo
    Not sure about this, as most escorts are not online daily so wouldn't do this, but will think about it. Thanks.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    8,638
    Blog Entries
    11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flypan View Post
    It sounds a very wise idea, sometimes should enough to say "she did all the services which are advertised and asked for... " and/or about her attitude "she was involved, or not, which helped me to enjoy my time, more or less", for example. The flipside to this, as in everything there is a flipside, is that when the review is positive enough the escort will rarely complain about any explicit sexual details discussed or described within the review. However, if the review was to be negative then the escort will use any means to her available to try undermine the genuinity of such review. So here it goes my question: Is it a matter of sexual descritptions, or there is also a component of tolerance on the part of escorts which they haven't learnt to deal with yet?

    Maybe, one solution, could be making it "free flow", no restrictions at all in any part, both escorts and punters. As with traffic, the more traffic lights and roundabouts we encounter in our way the longer it takes to complete our journey, hence the greater the risk for accidents and conflicts. Funny enough, there is a city in Holland where they have eliminated all traffic lights, don't ask me how but it's working well (and escorts in Holland don't charge 250 euros/hour)

    Maybe another way to avoid misunderstandings between punters and escorts would be to open threads especifically for punters, and other threads especifically for escorts, where I could read the escort's posts but not writte, and where escorts could read punter's posts but not writte. And then we could have the "boxing" thread for those who need to "meet" and let go their high spirits and help each other to coold down, after a negative escort experience or after an exhausting working day.
    Thanks for your feedback, Flypan. All good food for thought there.

  7. #37

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Patricia View Post
    Hi,

    Some escorts have complained to us that they find the current review system too sexually explicit. They say they wouldn't mind clients reviewing them in a way where the client could indicate if he was happy with the accuracy of their photos, the value for money of their service, whether they'd visit again etc, but they object to clients indicating they engaged in specific sexual acts with them and leaving descriptive text that is sexually explicit.

    We see this as a genuine complaint from escorts and want to resolve this issue, so more escorts allow reviews.

    It is currently planned that in a month or two, after a major update to our software, escorts will be able to opt to [1] accept reviews, [2] accept partial reviews (no sexually explicit content allowed) or [3] refuse reviews.

    We believe this will be a change for the better, but before everything is cast in stone, I would apreciate any feedback on this issue especially from anyone who doesn't think this is a good idea or can see problems with this new system that we may not have anticipated yet. Also, if you think it is a good idea, please post saying so, so we can know clients support this new system.

    Thanks

    Pat x
    Can we assume that this all stems from your recent change whereby escorts have to allow reviews in order to have verified photos? Can we further assume that some escorts are unhappy with this and threathening to move to pastures orange? This will not help any of us.
    I have not seen much explicit material in reviews recently but i may have missed something. Can you post links to a selection of reviews that are considered objectionable and the same for reviews that are considered acceptable. The kernel of the matter is to see if agreement can be reached on what will be allowed.

  8. Default ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Patricia View Post
    Thanks for your feedback, Flypan. All good food for thought there.
    https://www.escort-ireland.com/3367/...ck/review.html

    ?
    Peter.

  9. #39

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Patricia View Post
    I think statements like "Very Unhappy" "Unhappy" "Neutral" "Happy" "Very Happy" are better than numbers because different people have different standards when it comes to numbers. For example often people give 10 out of 10 too easily I find.
    I agree totally. There are escorts over on IIE that are no more than average and yet they often get 10/10 by clients sucking up to them

  10. #40

    Default An Easy answer to that would be:

    I think only people who write on this board and have a minimum number of posts under their belt SHOULD be able to post reviews!!! This would dramatically reduce the number of fake reviews! We could trust what is said MUCH more. Just now it's way too easy for people to create a profile and write just about anything!


    Look; for example, a wrote a review for the first time because I got diddled and got cheesed off - I wanted to warn other people and now I got some faker trying to undermine my credibility by stating that the girl in the profile I was reviewing was in fact not faked; this is totally not true, the profile is a fake. I saw the woman with my two own eyes and she did show me her room!!!

    The problem being described here:
    https://www.escort-ireland.com/board...ead.php?t=8060

Page 4 of 12 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •