Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 49

Thread: Be Careful

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,473
    Blog Entries
    2
    Reviews
    36

    Default

    You know it strikes me that E-I being the biggest escort website in the country could do a lot more to make it difficult for escorts who are the subject of dedicated police attention from advertising here. Some clients are going to get seriously burnt one day.Surely, where there is a will , there must be some way ?

  2. #32

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ksteve View Post
    You know it strikes me that E-I being the biggest escort website in the country could do a lot more to make it difficult for escorts who are the subject of dedicated police attention from advertising here. Some clients are going to get seriously burnt one day.Surely, where there is a will , there must be some way ?
    I am genuinly not being a knob here, but make what more difficult for escorts?
    “Nothing is more creative... nor destructive... than a brilliant mind with a purpose.”
    ― Dan Brown, Inferno

  3. #33

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by carlos marvado View Post
    However, as we all know, there are cops who like to put pressure on people to get information and who have been known to break the laws themselves. In addition one has nosy journos who love nothing better than to use any means to get salacious material for their rags........I believe you have a parliamentary enquiry in progress across the pond looking into how celebraties have had their privacy targetted by certain elements within the media. You see the great thing with the papers is that they can always print a retraction or shell out for damages if they get it wrong, but in the meantime they are making more money by operating the way they do than they are ever likely to be forced to pay out in damages.

    We also know there are those bent cops, that will do anything in their 'power' (which goes beyong their legal juristicition) to get information or to possibly even incriminate some escorts in order for them to start talking.

    What you speak of to my knowledge is true, it mainly kicked off due to the Ryan Giggs scandal, if im not mistaken,but as you say, the papers will print what they want and when they think it will make them the most money regardless of consequence or public image.
    “Nothing is more creative... nor destructive... than a brilliant mind with a purpose.”
    ― Dan Brown, Inferno

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,473
    Blog Entries
    2
    Reviews
    36

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PeepingTom View Post
    I am genuinly not being a knob here, but make what more difficult for escorts?
    I am at a disadvantage because as a client and not an insider in the industry , I dont know exactly what is or is not feasible and I accept that. However, it strikes me that, like drivers of cars, there are certain characteristics that go to make someone or a class of person more risky than others.

    Would the garda records show that sex ' trafficiked ' women fall mainly into certain age groups ? If yes, would that age group likely be girls under a certain age ? If so could not greater identification requirements be sought from those escorts before they are allowed to advertise.? I accept it is a difficult area but there must surely be some solutions or some steps that can be taken ?

  5. #35

    Default

    I'm curious about the letterkenny raid... It's says the boys in blue did survaillence on the apartment.... And then searched it by warrant... My understanding is they have to go to court to get a warrant and prove to a judge that they believe a brothal is in operation.... So it's would appear a number of client provided statements during the survaillence operation....

    So why don't these clients contact a member of the e-i team and tell them and the a pm can be sent to all memeber to warn them...

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    3,898
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tuam sham View Post
    I'm curious about the letterkenny raid... It's says the boys in blue did survaillence on the apartment.... And then searched it by warrant... My understanding is they have to go to court to get a warrant and prove to a judge that they believe a brothal is in operation.... So it's would appear a number of client provided statements during the survaillence operation....

    So why don't these clients contact a member of the e-i team and tell them and the a pm can be sent to all memeber to warn them...
    I suppose that most clients and users of E-I don't use the boards, so won't be creating a username to do so. Secondly it's probably illegal to do so, so if E-I was to get that info they are probably bound to report it to the Gardaí that tuam sham passed on info relating to a live investigation. If they failed to do that and tipped off the escorts then they can probably be prosecuted too.

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to monster_monster For This Useful Post:

    JAMESCORK (09-12-11)

  8. #37
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    5,436
    Reviews
    9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tuam sham View Post
    I'm curious about the letterkenny raid... It's says the boys in blue did survaillence on the apartment.... And then searched it by warrant... My understanding is they have to go to court to get a warrant and prove to a judge that they believe a brothal is in operation.... So it's would appear a number of client provided statements during the survaillence operation....

    So why don't these clients contact a member of the e-i team and tell them and the a pm can be sent to all memeber to warn them...
    There's still quite a few ladies listed under Donegal. I have'nt checked on how many of them are in Letterkenny, but I would imagine that business has got a lot quieter since that article appeared. Maybe it's the escorts who should be notified that if they go to Letterkenny now, they could end up being placed under Garda surveillance.

  9. #38
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    16,753
    Reviews
    57

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tuam sham View Post
    I'm curious about the letterkenny raid... It's says the boys in blue did survaillence on the apartment.... And then searched it by warrant... My understanding is they have to go to court to get a warrant and prove to a judge that they believe a brothal is in operation.... So it's would appear a number of client provided statements during the survaillence operation....

    So why don't these clients contact a member of the e-i team and tell them and the a pm can be sent to all memeber to warn them...
    They don't need to go before a Judge, they only need to get a signature from a Justice of the Peace which is a private individual supposed to be a representative of the local community which is a position given by the Gardai and once a Justice of the peace always a Justice, there are only a few in each county and they are legally allowed authorise a raid on a premises, furthermore up until very recently all gardai had to appear before a Justice and sign in front of them that the warrants they have issued, no matter the offence were leaglly issued, if the Justice had issue with the warrent/summons he could refuse to sign it which basically meant the summons/warrent could not be brought before a court until he was satisfied.

  10. #39

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tuam sham View Post
    I'm curious about the letterkenny raid... It's says the boys in blue did survaillence on the apartment.... And then searched it by warrant... My understanding is they have to go to court to get a warrant and prove to a judge that they believe a brothal is in operation.... So it's would appear a number of client provided statements during the survaillence operation....

    So why don't these clients contact a member of the e-i team and tell them and the a pm can be sent to all memeber to warn them...
    All they would need to do to prove a brothel was in operation was to ring the telephone number and be directed to the apartment. Then they would only need to see one man go inside, hey presto, proof. Sometimes they would go inside themselves to be offered a service. From the articles, it makes it clear they are watching certain sets of ladies. All you can do is try and decide from that really.
    If life gives you lemons ask for Tequila

    Only sad bastards seek gratification from signatures

  11. #40

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anon361 View Post
    They don't need to go before a Judge, they only need to get a signature from a Justice of the Peace which is a private individual supposed to be a representative of the local community which is a position given by the Gardai and once a Justice of the peace always a Justice, there are only a few in each county and they are legally allowed authorise a raid on a premises, furthermore up until very recently all gardai had to appear before a Justice and sign in front of them that the warrants they have issued, no matter the offence were leaglly issued, if the Justice had issue with the warrent/summons he could refuse to sign it which basically meant the summons/warrent could not be brought before a court until he was satisfied.
    They have to by law go before a district court judge section 19 CRIMINAL LAW AMENDMENT ACT, 1935. Is the power of searc with a warrant may have been replaced by section 12 of CRIMINAL LAW (SEXUAL OFFENCES) ACT, 1993

Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •