Censorship/Moderating Standards

[Judge Judy]

Nope Judge I do not need his and other brothers any aggravation

That's what I thwought!

[Doozer]

That's what I thwought!

[SR71]

I'm a curious sod too. Does the Patcave really exist.

E-I amend the rules to suit the situation, Carlos. After all, it's their site, and they can say and do what they like.

I might not contribute to "Last one to post wins" or "DOKO" but, for the most part, I'm happier posting a few pictures, jokes and sexy photos, than engaging in threads that are dominated by an almost exclusive club, who are dismissive of anyone that doesn't agree with their views.

I wonder how can others can get into that club?

I'm just curious why certain escorts were allowed to be down right rude to another poster no matter what his point is and yet he is the only one singled out for a quiet warning, even make unsubstantiated remarks without the need for proof, would we be allowed make such comments about them? I like most on here but it would seem a few ladies are allowed over step the mark, especially when it would seem to be a popular stance or the poster isn't doing themselves any favours and yet if one of us was to speak to an escort like they speak to certain posters there would be uproar..
Don't get me wrong, there contribution to the boards is most welcome but a bit too bitchy and a little too much mud slinging hopeing some will stick for my liking..

They have a PI following me, seemingly I left a snail trail!

I presume my comments were allowed because of SR71'S comments and conduct elsewhere Anon. As for hoping mud will stick, no not really, he went and wallowed in it.

Why does my conduct else where concern you? Oh I forgot, I left a snail trail.

Of course I do Anon. I also know that the SR71 ones first post back after his absence was to have a dig at other ladies for supposedly complaining about prices. At no point did the young lady in question get slated for her prices. I also realise it mustnt be a very nice feeling to see what you consider bullying, I can only say in that case you would need to look at the forum I read to realise that the only bullies are the people that do their dirty work under multi nicks.

You know me quite well, and you know im pretty straightforward. I wouldnt countenance bullying either. At no point did I feel that it was vitriolic, but I am open to correction if that was the case. SR71 took a mod job elsewhere, not only that then made crowing posts of a derogatory nature about ladies here, and then tried to come back under this ID to slate us further, erroneously. I dont feel that is cricket, do you?

So, it's ok for you to have a go but not others? Jeepers, again I forgot, I'm not from the exclusive club, I'm senile really.
If you don't countenance bullying, why are you so against anybody who disagrees with your opinions? What proof (in black & white ), that I'm a mod elsewhere. I didn't try to slate any ladies, just trying to make my opinion heard, whether it's right or wrong.

Lucy, you know me too, I tell it as I see it and while you may be aware of contributing factors as to why you posted some of the comments but me and others that don't really get involved it did come across a bit heavy handed, I'm not saying what you were saying was wrong but without showing proof just suggestions of further knowledge isn't really on, later on down the road someone else could say derogatory comments about a lady insinuating they had knowledge from other sources and without showing where that too wouldn't be right.

That's why I'm asking for proof ( in black & white ) Anon.

The site I am referring to is down, and my ass would be banned for posting the link, but you are entirely right, it is my fault for assuming people know things they clearly dont. As SR71 was one of the people i believe was circulating PM's asking people to join his new site, along with Mr Maxi, I did assume quite alot of people knew. My bad. Do you accept apologies in Haribo?

I must also add, I did make the site aware of my concerns and as such, they probably allowed it for that reason.

You being banned on EI??? No way!!! I'm sure there would be an uproar about that! Now, I'll add this, ''Assumption is the mother of all fuck up's''. Since you beleive I was one of the persons, circulating PM's asking yo join the new site, just a question for you here, ''Why am I not still a banned user?''.
So if you want to accuse me of sending those PM's, I'm afraid whoever told you/gave you the information, is not credible.! I guess you can thank them profuriously now can you!

It does'nt just extend to certain escorts Brother Anon. Is a fellow poster made feel welcomed or valued here when a forum manager describes his post or it's contents as ridiculous? So what if it is? I would be bored stupid here if everyone else thought like me and agreed with me on everything. Where would be the pleasure of a stimulating debate in that? I agree totally about the bitchiness and insults..........anybody who can't show their opponent in a debate some respect, does'nt deserve any in return.......play the ball and not the person!

Brother Carlos, boredom is the new trend I think.

[QUOTE=anon361;645913]Lucy, you know I love ye and you never have to apologise to me

Lick arse!

Heather, you know I don't feel that way but yet you seem to always play the women are victimised card somehow insinuating we think women should be seen and not heard, it's getting old..

That's always the case with Auntie Heather, but she enjoys taking the money from clients.

Actually no, I didn't I made a comment relevant to a thread on this site, that comment was picked up on by you and another lady so I sent both a PM saying why I made such comments and my reasoning in private were not hearsay. You as you do went back and twisted what was said out of all proportions. It wasn't something I felt fair to say in an open forum but felt saying what I knew to another escort that knew the score would be OK, it wasn't and I whole heartedly accept I was wrong, even repeating something in private, you can even run along to the lady in question as even very recently I made contact again to apologise directly to her for saying something I shouldn't have so Heather, I have nothing to hide or be ashamed of so your mud slinging won't work on me, nice try tough

I didn't know Auntie Heather can play twister, for her age? Yikes!

While I would agree with you to a certain point Brother Anon, and Nicole is certainly entitled, as is anyone else to believe that Brother SR71's post was ridiculous, there is a difference in you or I making that statement and a member of E-I staff who could be seen to be posting ex cathedra, particularly when the thread happened to be locked after Nicole's comment about SR71's post, thereby forestalling a response from SR71 or anyone else for that matter.........now that's something that you or I could not do; if we have a go at someone or insult them, we can either expect to be censured or endure a rebuttle from the offended party.

Brother Carlos, what I can see is there are no way my views will be accepted, as Lucy would put it, 'Simples'!

I did wonder why the thread was locked, but lets face it, the rebuttal was hardly going to win the war in SR71's case. I think they are trying to move away from endless threads that turn into arguments, which is why you, I and Heather should probably behave

I wonder how you know, my rebuttal won't win the war? Yes, I've moved along from threads that turn into arguments.

I agree Carlos that it was wrong to lock the thread but I don't agree that moderators can't have an opinion even if it is they think someone is a gobshite.
But if they were to call a poster a gobshite I don't agree with the thread being locked so one can't defend themselves, unless they are coming from and indefensible stance that is, then lock the thread before they do themselves more harm and get banned which in fairness, is what happens a lot..

I was told by 2 Mods, to back of from that thread, which I did. I don't have to defend myself, when I know, the statements put to me has no proof.

I will behave. But I don't see why we need all this fuss and dissection about SR17. He's a cock. What else needs to be said?
I will hush now cos I know Nic has a headache..

Um..




Er..


Oh fuck it. He is

If you both can call me a cock, I will call you both Heffers. Since you both are clever, I'm sure you know, what scientists think is also one of the contributors of global warming, which is Methane gas, coming out of the cows anus!
But to me I feel, it's coming out of you mouth as well. If only we can harvest the gas coming out of both of you and put it to good use. Sigh, I can't see both of you agreeing to that experiment!

[SR71]

I will summarise my point now. I would want to thank Sam for clarifying EI's stance on regulators. Sam has also highlighted that it's nobodies business, what an escort charges. Hope the people in 'concern' will understand this.

Judge Judy, do us a favour would you? Climb up onto Byrd's shoulders and fly away back to you where you came from.

If I can be singled out in this thread, I will single out Lucy and Heather. As far as I can recall, you both were really good posters when you began, there was no anger or retribution against anyone. Even though, I only joined EI this June, I've been following it since late 2009, so that's why I know how you both post before.

I don't know why you both have turned into unclassy and revengeful poster. Maybe the power has gone to your head? There is no more straight forward posting from both of you. Everything has to be masked with well put sentences. Yes, that's the way I see it.

Ladies, come on! Even though you want to attack someone, do you think it will have any impact? Surely it will impact more to you because readers of the forums, will see how you post and deduce that, it's not worth seeing you both. Yea you might say it won't affect your business, if thats the case why complain about expenses then? I don't see any other ladies complaining on the open about their expenses. At least they are adapting their business to the current climate.

I can go on more but I will leave it at this. I will apologise if you both thought I was having a go but I was not. Please find your bright side and throw away the darkness in you both! It's very unpleasant, for people to see!

Thank you.

[Lucy Chambers]

Blah blah blah blah

Hi chick

I dont need anyone to tell me anything, I am very good at recognising syntax. I would be willing to bet quite alot on that, and to be honest, coming back, time and time again, to try and lie, its lame. My contacts are the best there are.

You forget your posts there, AH64. I do not. I did not have a bad thought in my head about you, but clearly you have several thoughts about others. I saw all of that You arent banned because you havent crossed a line and no one can read your PM's, so until there is a report, you will remain. And why not? All are welcome here, agenda ridden or not. But dont try and be clever..

[UKHeather]

heifer

If you want to call me a name, at least learn to spell it first.

Arf Arf

[Lucy Chambers]

I will summarise my point now. I would want to thank Sam for clarifying EI's stance on regulators. Sam has also highlighted that it's nobodies business, what an escort charges. Hope the people in 'concern' will understand this.

Judge Judy, do us a favour would you? Climb up onto Byrd's shoulders and fly away back to you where you came from.

If I can be singled out in this thread, I will single out Lucy and Heather. As far as I can recall, you both were really good posters when you began, there was no anger or retribution against anyone. Even though, I only joined EI this June, I've been following it since late 2009, so that's why I know how you both post before.

I don't know why you both have turned into unclassy and revengeful poster. Maybe the power has gone to your head? There is no more straight forward posting from both of you. Everything has to be masked with well put sentences. Yes, that's the way I see it.

Ladies, come on! Even though you want to attack someone, do you think it will have any impact? Surely it will impact more to you because readers of the forums, will see how you post and deduce that, it's not worth seeing you both. Yea you might say it won't affect your business, if thats the case why complain about expenses then? I don't see any other ladies complaining on the open about their expenses. At least they are adapting their business to the current climate.

I can go on more but I will leave it at this. I will apologise if you both thought I was having a go but I was not. Please find your bright side and throw away the darkness in you both! It's very unpleasant, for people to see!

Thank you.

Unclassy and vengeful? You would need to ask our clients about that. The problem is we have seen too many posters just like you, cunt struck and in too big a frenzy to see sense when it is said. That is why your new forum consists of scammers and a stalker. Nice work.

To be honest sweetie I can pull you apart in seconds but I have lost my appetite, I have started to feel abusing you is akin to abusing the disabled. Good luck with your crusade. You are going to find me a formidable opponent. I hope for your sake this stuff is so boring you learn your lesson, but I suspect not. What type of man threatens to ''prime his weapons'' against the threat of ladies posting on a forum?

I will tell you. A stain.

[ChiefHandker]

I wonder how can others can get into that club?
What proof (in black & white ), that I'm a mod elsewhere.

Having had a look at the other site in question one day, I stopped reading your post right here. If you're going to deny here what you admitted on that site and was common knowledge, then there's no point in reading on as it's clearly bollocks.
As for proof, as most of us here know that website seems to be down at the moment.

[SR71]

All I will say is I kept to the topic of this thread, so I have a right too, to go off topic on this thread. But my very final word is this '' BREED COUNTS''. Wakakaka.

[Lucy Chambers]

Having had a look at the other site in question one day, I stopped reading your post right here. If you're going to deny here what you admitted on that site and was common knowledge, then there's no point in reading on as it's clearly bollocks.
As for proof, as most of us here know that website seems to be down at the moment.

Thanks for that chickie. I appreciate the fact at least one person sees the collossal joke of this person claiming to be innocent. Yup, trust him, his friends, and his reviews.


You may not like me SR71. I dont like you now. But I never lie, and many people have evidence of this.