Carlos and I are having a debate... I wouldn't say everyone's having a go at him. The said trend is really two threads: the Angelina Paris thread was removed (for reasons I have explained several times) and another thread which I did accidently delete, and I completely admit that, and I have already said I'm sorry.
I have the upmost respect for Anon. He is a helpful, polite and informative chap and I have a lot of time for him, but he decided to leave on his own accord and that truly is a shame, but he is always welcome. In fairness, we have never said that he revealed the escort's name. In fact he states that the escort said that he did reveal her name himself in this thread, post number 23:
https://www.escort-ireland.com/board...t=75995&page=3.
My reaction was apparent in this thread:
https://www.escort-ireland.com/board...ad.php?t=75987
I was a little frustrated because I actually told Anon that this really is the escort in the picture and then the thread continued. The escort said that she posted the videos to confirm that this really is her; she was proving herself to be genuine to Anon. The problem is she did actually have two previous fake photo reports, and I am assuming that this is because she wanted to avoid the detection, and of course, this brought her more attention when she put up her real pictures.
It was good on her part to send in genuine pictures and to stick out the active photo reports, rather than create another profile which would also be a big problem.
As I have already said, there have been a good few escort profiles that have genuine pictures that have been reported. We have a system in place for people to report fake photos and the reason we request people to use this is so that we can avoid any potential mistakes. I did ask Anon to report things properly, and I told him that he should not keep posting screen shots of fake photo reports because a) they are already active on the escort profile and b) he is posting the fake photo reports before they are moderated in the form of a 'head's up' thread. I also agree with Lucy's comment that everything in the thread we are referring to was twisted and lost, and this is another reason why we try to discourage these types of threads.
I know Anon was trying to be helpful, but we need to maintain a balance between reporting issues and setting up a thread which will inevitably start a series of people jumping on an escort.
Personally, I think that's fair for both parties and clients should be enocouraged to check the fake photo report section of each escort profile to make a decision, along with reviews and photo verifications.
Lucy, your points are duly acknowledged and I agree that most things should be debated rather than removed. This is something that was mentioned a few weeks ago and I genuinely think that there has been less of this (apart from last night of course), and in the event things do get removed or edited, we make a conscious effort to inform the involved parties.