Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17

Thread: Are these linked?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    31,568

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anon361 View Post
    PM was sent and thread reported to bring it to the attention of mods, still nothing done
    Okay, Charlie is already dealing with this one. She is removing the pictures on both profiles and requesting verification photos from 'both' escorts. They will be banned from uploading pictures so they can't upload any more fakes.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to samlad For This Useful Post:

    anon361 (02-10-11)

  3. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    5,436
    Reviews
    9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hd7055 View Post
    This is getting ridiculous - day after day really professional photos of stunners offering 'A' in D 1/2 for EUR 160. As posters we know this is a scam but remember the majority of people using this site do not use the boards. Does letting this kind of crap continue represent a good business model for this site?

    Genuine punters pissed off. Genuine escorts pissed off. And potentially revenue down as a result ...
    While there is logic in your post Brother hd7055, I somehow doubt that there has been any reduction in revenue. You would need a realistic alternative for that to happen, and any reduction in the number of genuine indies advertising would probably be more than offset by the large influx of fakers.

  4. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    31,568

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hd7055 View Post
    Anon

    Keep up the good work - see you managed to beat my Lela Star fake report!

    This is getting ridiculous - day after day really professional photos of stunners offering 'A' in D 1/2 for EUR 160. As posters we know this is a scam but remember the majority of people using this site do not use the boards. Does letting this kind of crap continue represent a good business model for this site?

    Genuine punters pissed off. Genuine escorts pissed off. And potentially revenue down as a result ...

    The whole verified pictures concept needs to be looked at since at this point it has f**k all credibility. Simple suggestion - can E-I instruct Adstaff to check all new images using the method Anon posted previously ( prior to superimposing the little green logo)?

    Simples, no?
    Well, that's why we have a big red cross and a filter system to stop punters looking up non-verified pictures.

    We have the same verification system as MOST escort and swinging sites world-wide. Unless we turn up to every location and personally interview the escort, it will never be full-proof.

  5. #14

    Default

    Aletta Ocean is also in town but decided to change her name in case she was getting TOO MUCH business...

    https://www.escort-ireland.com/21492...sh-escort.html

    I didnt bother filing a fake pics report because I couldnt find the actual pics anywhere else online....

  6. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    916
    Reviews
    4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hd7055 View Post

    This is getting ridiculous - day after day really professional photos of stunners offering 'A' in D 1/2 for EUR 160. As posters we know this is a scam but remember the majority of people using this site do not use the boards. Does letting this kind of crap continue represent a good business model for this site?

    Genuine punters pissed off. Genuine escorts pissed off. And potentially revenue down as a result ...

    The whole verified pictures concept needs to be looked at since at this point it has f**k all credibility. Simple suggestion - can E-I instruct Adstaff to check all new images using the method Anon posted previously ( prior to superimposing the little green logo)?

    Simples, no?
    Don't see how revenue would be down. Every time an Anon or monstermonster exposes a fake profile twice the pics the pulled and the profile will usually be seen no more... until the people behind the profiles pay for a new fake add which subsequently gets exposed by Anon et al. Rinse, repeat. If anything this merry-go-round generates far more revenue for EI.

    I agree with ya though, It would be great if Ad Staff had something like Tineye open in a browser when accepting a new advert.

  7. #16
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    16,753
    Reviews
    57

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ChiefHandker View Post
    Don't see how revenue would be down. Every time an Anon or monstermonster exposes a fake profile twice the pics the pulled and the profile will usually be seen no more... until the people behind the profiles pay for a new fake add which subsequently gets exposed by Anon et al. Rinse, repeat. If anything this merry-go-round generates far more revenue for EI.

    I agree with ya though, It would be great if Ad Staff had something like Tineye open in a browser when accepting a new advert.
    I agree, why wouldn't E-I take the money, let them run the risk of being caught out, remove their ad and charge them to put up a new one, good business model if you ask me but crap for the end user..

  8. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    5,436
    Reviews
    9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anon361 View Post
    I agree, why wouldn't E-I take the money, let them run the risk of being caught out, remove their ad and charge them to put up a new one, good business model if you ask me but crap for the end user..
    Well for those end users who only use their bell end for thinking with maybe. Any punter who takes a little time and effort to check things out properly will end up saving himself from disappointments.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •