Should the Top Reviewers be removed from the Escort Reviews Page ....

[doodlebug]

Ah yes always one that sits on the fence Lol.

Fence sitting very dangerous, think of where the splinters might go!!!!!!

[ksteve]

My original comment may have been harsh. As you said its on going the last few days. Sam has made it clear that the rules wont be changed. I do feel sorry for Mark444 as like everyone i think he is a great poster and reviewer. What i was trying to say in my first post and sorry if it came across as smart is the rules wont be changed according to sam so we should move on.

Never say NO to change for the better. Whats happened to " Is feidir linn " !!

[lovethegirls]

Never say NO to change for the better. Whats happened to " Is feidir linn " !!

I just dont like change thats my problem

[Fitzy]

Fence sitting very dangerous, think of where the splinters might go!!!!!!

Jasus don't go there not a nice thought.

[Morpheus]

I voted no! I really don't want to see the list going. First TR badges go. Next the reviewers list. Next the drop down boxes in the reviews. Next the tick box of services received. Eventually they will be a call that all reviews be anonymous. And at that stage we might as well stop reviewing all together!!!

There is no system that is going to please everybody (God help the Mods, who know this beter than anyone else).

But there has been a trend to keep chipping away at the system untill its of no use. Individual punters can choose to review or not.

[Rayden]

I voted no! I really don't want to see the list going. First TR badges go. Next the reviewers list. Next the drop down boxes in the reviews. Next the tick box of services received. Eventually they will be a call that all reviews be anonymous. And at that stage we might as well stop reviewing all together!!!

There is no system that is going to please everybody (God help the Mods, who know this beter than anyone else).

But there has been a trend to keep chipping away at the system untill its of no use. Individual punters can choose to review or not.

What purpose does that list serve?

[Eugen]

I see it having no useful purpose other than flattering some people ego.
It has been suggested it could be open to abuse.

I also fail to see why Mark is not allowed change his name.

But what do I know? I'm not here long

[Fitzy]

I see it having no useful purpose other than flattering some people ego.
It has been suggested it could be open to abuse.

I also fail to see why Mark is not allowed change his name.

But what do I know? I'm not here long

You still have an opinion.

[Eugen]

You still have an opinion.

I assume I'm allowed that. Lol

[aml]

Amm if some ppl think their privacy is being cromprimised don't review....simples