nick2010 (13-04-11)
Lucy Chambers (13-04-11)
Yes, point taken. However without being facetious this system is not workable.
So, if we take out the trusted reviewer element, all we have left is reviews. It has been repeatedly shown that both escorts and reviewers can manipulate the system.
I propose that Chief Hander has the best idea.
If life gives you lemons ask for Tequila
Only sad bastards seek gratification from signatures
kelso (13-04-11)
In response to Kelso...
Similarly there is a 'trusted reviewer' system in place in that an escort can make a comment on her review and even get it ratted and I've seen quite measured reviews mysteriously disappear ( speaking of systems open to abuse !).
All of that is good enough for me, if not perfect.
Utopia is a difficult target and an unnecessary one at that.
Last edited by Bruno69; 13-04-11 at 11:10.
kelso (13-04-11)
Here are the votes so far, by type of voter:
Escorts: 15 Yes, 5 No
TR's: 4 Yes, 15 No
Others: 43 Yes, 29 No
“I wish you wouldn’t keep appearing and vanishing so suddenly; you make one quite giddy!”
“All right,” said the Cat; and this time it vanished quite slowly, beginning with the end of the tail, and ending with the grin, which remained some time after the rest of it had gone.
kelso (13-04-11)
The TR system like this site needs a revamping. But we will deal with the TR issue for the moment. Allow me to preface this statement with this: The TR's I have seen to date have been absolutely perfect gentleman, I haven't a bad word about any of them.
But in all areas of life you will have bad mixed in with the good, and of course the bad will get the most notice, because let's be honest a plane crash killing 100 people makes for better headlines. Thus is the case with the very few bad TR here. I suggest instead of getting rid of the system all together, I mean some men have shagged half of UN to get to this point, and all that hard-ahem-work, shouldn't go to waste. Why not change it so it is like the popularity bar under our profiles? Instead of Trusted Reviewer, some people take this WAY too serious and feel they have to adhere to certain international standards of shagging. Why not make it a bit more fun? The guys earn points as they leave reviews. The reviews are still relevant, but if someone puts up a fake review, or a ratted review, it will subtract from their punter rep/street cred/shaggability, whatever you want to call it. As it stands now even ratted reviews and those damn annoying N/A reports are counted towards the over all total of the TR/reviewer scorecard.
Reviews do serve a purpose to inform other punters of what is out there. With the implementation of something like this, everyone would have a rating, from Mr. Fussy, to the newest newbie on the block. What do you guys think?
Last edited by Violette; 13-04-11 at 11:27.
☆
RETURNING TO THE EMERALD ISLE SHORTLY
❤❤❤❤
kelso (13-04-11)