Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 18 of 18

Thread: Would you thing these are real?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    5,355

    Default

    Actually she has two sets before these and both verified and look like her, these ones might just be bad lighting, bad camera angles.
    Last edited by Quarterpoundher; 29-03-11 at 22:53.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Quarterpoundher For This Useful Post:

    Headlad (30-03-11)

  3. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    36,558
    Blog Entries
    15
    Reviews
    53

    Default

    Thread moved to warning section and report sent in .: doc
    Never mistake kindness for weakness .: doc

  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to dr love For This Useful Post:

    BIGTYM2010 (30-03-11), Nicole (29-03-11)

  5. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    3,606
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    the second photo is a bit odd to be honest- but i still reckon it's her. mark444 has left a review and in my opinion he is 100% trustworthy
    Want to see my X rated content? Come join here - https://www.escortfans.com/ebony-amber-xxx

  6. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Ebony Amber For This Useful Post:

    Headlad (30-03-11), Sam Spade (30-03-11)

  7. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    579
    Reviews
    15

    Default

    I've seen her - it's definitely her. I do agree that they look a bit odd, like they've been touched up by someone who sucks at photoshop. The old photos were better, and a couple of her current ones are decent too.

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Headlad For This Useful Post:

    Sam Spade (30-03-11)

  9. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    2,209
    Reviews
    43

    Default

    I visited this lady back in January 2011.
    This is the lady in question.

    Pictures may have been photo-shopped a bit, but she is easily recognisable from the time I saw her.
    Trust me I would never forget that face and body and it is a cracking body by the way.

    Trying to see her again this tour, but a few ladies to see first.
    So many ladies to see with so little time to spare.

    I would be willing to visit her for a longer period if you wish me to make an indepth investigation,
    (just to ascertain the veracity of the pics of course!).
    All donations grateful received at. mark444.com.
    Last edited by Sam Spade; 30-03-11 at 12:37.

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to Sam Spade For This Useful Post:

    Headlad (30-03-11)

  11. #16
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    13,265

    Default

    Her pictures are genuine. I got message from Ad Staff that this is Lady from pictures.
    xx
    Nicole

  12. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Nicole For This Useful Post:

    Headlad (30-03-11), Sam Spade (30-03-11), samlad (30-03-11)

  13. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    16,753
    Reviews
    57

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dr love View Post
    Thread moved to warning section and report sent in .: doc
    Quote Originally Posted by Nicole View Post
    Her pictures are genuine. I got message from Ad Staff that this is Lady from pictures.
    xx
    Nicole
    Not really fair having this in the warning section in light of Nicole's last post, people may not read the whole thing and just skim and get the wrong impression?

  14. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to anon361 For This Useful Post:

    Headlad (30-03-11), monster_monster (30-03-11)

  15. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    2,209
    Reviews
    43

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nicole View Post
    Her pictures are genuine. I got message from Ad Staff that this is Lady from pictures.
    xx
    Nicole
    Does that mean i can't claim my next visit against E-I expenses?
    (always wanted to be an E-I verification expert!) ...........

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •