Escorts not offering certain favorites or services to certain people but not others?

[Cable87]

Ladies & gents:

I rarely play Devil's Advocate, and never intend to cause or stirr-up controversy here on the boards, but are we all forgetting about or being too dismissive of the all-too-often occurance of FALSE ADVERTISING?


While I fully agree with and totally support the right of escorts to refuse service, in full or in part, and any aspect or favourite they offer for whatever reason they decide (and I can totally understand the hygiene issues, that's under absolutely no dispute at all), I still must point out that there are many cases of blatantly FALSE advertising going on in regards to certain services and/or listed 'favourites'.

I'm not worried so much about being refused a 'favourite' from an escort that another punter has (or claims to have) received; if she doesn't want to do something, fair enough, I wouldn't want a lady doing something they weren't willing to do. But what I am worried about is cases where some escorts list favourites on their profiles which they NEVER do for ANYONE, and now with escorts being allowed to ask that no 'graphic' descriptions be left in their reviews, then the reviewers can't even tick the favourites they received when writing a review, thus leaving other punters without a fully detailed and accurate review of the ladies' service. I know many reviewers will simply say something like "all favourites provided", but like someone else said above, how can we really know for sure, or know that some specfic thing/favourite we would like actually was provided or not?

Considerning the fact that so many punters form their decision on who to see based on the reviews left by others, it seems a rather important point to me that escorts not only be accurate in their advertising and that reviews should be allowed to specify if something wasn't provided, but that escorts who falsely advertise favourites which they simply don't do be held to account for it in some way.

[Cindy Forever]

that be me than hun ;-) cindy is spot on be very clean and dont eat before hand,i shave n trim down below,the girls who do owo have all said the enjoy it better when the client is this way.

You know me and know i do my best for who is clean as you darling (Ladys i highly recommend davedrave,He is a guy all we escorts wish) Thanks davedrave xxx

[davedrave]

You know me and know i do my best for who is clean as you darling (Ladys i highly recommend davedrave,He is a guy all we escorts wish) Thanks davedrave xxx

i try me best,thanks cindy

[captivated]

Ladies & gents:

I rarely play Devil's Advocate, and never intend to cause or stirr-up controversy here on the boards, but are we all forgetting about or being too dismissive of the all-too-often occurance of FALSE ADVERTISING?


While I fully agree with and totally support the right of escorts to refuse service, in full or in part, and any aspect or favourite they offer for whatever reason they decide (and I can totally understand the hygiene issues, that's under absolutely no dispute at all), I still must point out that there are many cases of blatantly FALSE advertising going on in regards to certain services and/or listed 'favourites'.

I'm not worried so much about being refused a 'favourite' from an escort that another punter has (or claims to have) received; if she doesn't want to do something, fair enough, I wouldn't want a lady doing something they weren't willing to do. But what I am worried about is cases where some escorts list favourites on their profiles which they NEVER do for ANYONE, and now with escorts being allowed to ask that no 'graphic' descriptions be left in their reviews, then the reviewers can't even tick the favourites they received when writing a review, thus leaving other punters without a fully detailed and accurate review of the ladies' service. I know many reviewers will simply say something like "all favourites provided", but like someone else said above, how can we really know for sure, or know that some specfic thing/favourite we would like actually was provided or not?

Considerning the fact that so many punters form their decision on who to see based on the reviews left by others, it seems a rather important point to me that escorts not only be accurate in their advertising and that reviews should be allowed to specify if something wasn't provided, but that escorts who falsely advertise favourites which they simply don't do be held to account for it in some way.

This is an absolutely true statement. And yo have usually paid in full before you realise that the escort does not do any of the said things. It can be very offputting.

[Blond chick NIKKY]

This is an absolutely true statement. And yo have usually paid in full before you realise that the escort does not do any of the said things. It can be very offputting.

Just read yr review... so i see why yr so angry. Just wonder why all other clients was happy with that girl... NOT all girls are like that at all.

I offer owo,fk,facial but if somebody is not clean then even any money will make me give him this service. No way! Hygiene and health are more important things!

[Cindy Forever]

i try me best,thanks cindy

And you did...xxxx

[BIGTYM2010]

Agree with the other answers but also keep in mind not all reviewers are genuine they may say they received it but that's not always the case ...Hygiene is a major thing but if you have this then it must be fake reviews... Or the lady wasn't comfortable with you..highly unlikely tho.