Martee strikes again

[Rachel Divine]

Escort Ireland - Escort Reviews - Review 034369 - Irish Independent Escorts, Irish Touring Escorts, Irish Escort Agencies
https://www.escort-ireland.com/34369/Emma/review.html

Well, if thats the case when reviews after beeen ratted shouldnt be removed, how come the user name steerpike been banned and both his review removed after an investigation that tuck place and come out to be a fake reviewer... He aslo had a review for erika to which i cant get the number to attached....
How come the rules are not rules for every fake reviewer?

PS..This is only one example of a user name I saw the threat over, but are many others that been banned after they the reviews came out as fake and the reviews removed..

[El Gordo]

I never said reviews aren't removed. I said they shouldn't be removed. I've been complaining about this practice for a long time. Here are some of the reasons why I think this is a bad idea:

- Often these people come back with a new name. How can we recognise them if we no longer have the old reviews to compare to the new ones?
- Sometimes review text is copied, but then the original review is deleted. I've seen this more than once. It's much harder to spot this if the original review is gone.
- Mods make mistakes. Sometimes reviews are ratted which shouldn't be. This is much less likely to be noticed and corrected if the review is deleted rather than just ratted.
- We are adults. We should be given the facts and allowed to make our own judgments. It's helpful to have the mods' opinions in the form of a rat, but it's no substitute for making up our own minds.

That's why I think reviews should almost never be deleted. Consistency would be good, but I would prefer E-I consistently doing the right thing to consistently doing the wrong thing.

[samlad]

We don't delete ratted reviews for the reasons El Gordo has pointed out.

[hornylimerick]

We don't delete ratted reviews for the reasons El Gordo has pointed out.

At least all his reviews should be ratted,,,with three fakes,,,no confirmation other two are genuine surely they all should be ratted??

[samlad]

At least all his reviews should be ratted,,,with three fakes,,,no confirmation other two are genuine surely they all should be ratted??

The reviews that are regarded as suspicious have been ratted. I think it's time you let this go now, fella.

[Sam Spade]

The reviews that are regarded as suspicious have been ratted. I think it's time you let this go now, fella.

May I ask one question please.

I am aware if a member has three reviews ratted that the member is banned.

Why is it the remaining reviews are not ratted?
Is it the case they are only ratted where they do not cause the innocent escort any harm?
This banned member has had 60% of his reviews ratted, it seems his remaining reviews are dubious to say the least.
If it is the case they aren't ratted to protect the innocent escorts reputation, then I would understand and accept it.

Not trying to make any point here, just a question.

[mileysweet]

The reviews that are regarded as suspicious have been ratted. I think it's time you let this go now, fella.

1 question also.....when this rule of keeping up reviews from a fake reviewer and banned user start being applied????

[hornylimerick]

The reviews that are regarded as suspicious have been ratted. I think it's time you let this go now, fella.

No Sam, it's about time you started doing your job!
you cant rat some of his reviews and not all,,, none of them have been confirmed genuine,,,if your not going to rat all of them, then you should delete all of them,,, fair is fair,,, if the other two were negative you'd have ratted or deleted them,,,you should man up and stop playing favorites!
I'm sorry sam but you are being completely unfair and dishonest on this issue! please just do what you know what should have been done at the start, delete them or rat them at least,,,did you know that as soon as martee was banned he sent an email to one of the girls who he falsely reviewed asking her if she wanted another one,,,if he was genuine he might have complained about being banned or about his review being ratted but no he asked if she wanted another review,,,does that sound like a genuine gut to you????
I pm'ed the highwayman saturday with the email but heard nothing back,,,probably because your trying to save face and are afraid to admit when you've made a mistake cos you listened to the wrong people,,,people who have things against the escorts who received the fake reviews,,, you are supposed to be an impartial moderator here, but your far from it!
I know exactly your next step. delete my post, lock the thread and then .......?
I will continue to post and voice my opinions when i see injustices being done!

[El Gordo]

Sorry, I haven't been following this story from the beginning, but could someone summarise what it is we actually know to be true? Preferably with some indication of how we know it.