Shut Down

[samlad]

Indeed i would like u to show me where anything that wasnt factual was written on those other threads. It is quite apparent
to even the most mentally challenged that the new or back advertising contains girls which are neither new or back.
Can u dispute that fact with me? seeing as we must stick to the facts here

The allegations were centred around the whole concept that this site is held afloat by agencies. That's all.

[ber]

The allegations were centred around the whole concept that this site is held afloat by agencies. That's all.

And would u please answer my query,which i will repeat , do u accept that there are girls advertised as being new or back
which are neither? A yes or no will suffice not a politicans answer

[samlad]

And would u please answer my query,which i will repeat , do u accept that there are girls advertised as being new or back
which are neither? A yes or no will suffice not a politicans answer

Apologies if you feel I've diverted from the question. To be honest, at first I didn't think there was an issue, now I'm not quite sure, hence the reason I have asked the technical team to investigate it. So to be straight up and to ensure there is no ambiguity whatsoever, I don't know yet.

[ber]

Apologies if you feel I've diverted from the question. To be honest, at first I didn't think there was an issue, now I'm not quite sure, hence the reason I have asked the technical team to investigate it. So to be straight up and to ensure there is no ambiguity whatsoever, I don't know yet.

Well i got the one thing i didnt ask for a politicians answer, here here now Sam when i can see it with all the information
u have at hand u can surely see it. A fine fudge if ever i heard one

[lcilis26]

The allegations were centred around the whole concept that this site is held afloat by agencies. That's all.

Who alleged that? Or alleged anything for that matter! It was simply noted that New or Back no longer works as before and that some of the girls there are neither New or Back.